People Twitter

7251 readers

796 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

593

AI must be stopped... (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

104 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

How did you get "redo" from "verifying sources"? Even if only 10% is good in any case (very rare but it is better at some subjects then others), that is still 10% you don't have to do. What we currently have is also the worst it's going to be.

Keep burying your head in the sand but you will just become the laughing stock of your office. You guys are aiming to become this decades "boomer that types with one finger".

Just the amount of time I save when I ask it to build me tables I can drop into documents is worth it. It's my information, I just don't have to copy paste it one by one into excel. People that are anti-AI in professional contexts are actually nuts.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

That happy middle ground is so effective, so sad to see people dismissing it as useless. Also sad that people use it for everything and believe it all the time.

Great example of a good use case was using it to spell check my thesis, asking it to explain why it was wrongly spelled and then using my own brain, think if it is correct. That way I am more sure I catch things that I may have missed (suprise, I missed a lot and got helped a lot). Yes 30% was plain wrong but I just ignored that.