this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
690 points (99.3% liked)
Hardware
2112 readers
330 users here now
All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.
Rules (Click to Expand):
-
Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about
-
Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.
-
No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.
-
Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.
-
Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).
-
If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.
Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:
- Augmented Reality - [email protected]
- Gaming Laptops - [email protected]
- Laptops - [email protected]
- Linux Hardware - [email protected]
- Mechanical Keyboards - [email protected]
- Microcontrollers - [email protected]
- Monitors - [email protected]
- Raspberry Pi - [email protected]
- Retro Computing - [email protected]
- Single Board Computers - [email protected]
- Virtual Reality - [email protected]
Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What's the license of the files? Are third parties able to modify and sell them?
Right. It's pre-emptive to prevent people from profiting off of 3d printed replacements.
That sucks
Let's not let perfect be the enemy of good...
Pretty sure it would be better if they didn't release anything at all. Then I wouldn't be breaking the law if I sold both their product and replacement parts for their product
You can still do that
Its NC. The license makes that illegal
If they released nothing you wouldn't be breaking the law because you wouldn't be selling it.
You still have to option of not selling it.
And just take a loss on the filament? That's dumb.
You can always print another benchy.
What if the good is greatly dimished by not perfection, but something totally reasonable or even expectable?
Good question!
It looks like Creative Commons non-commercial, according to the download page.
So no reselling. I wonder if that prevents print shops from renting use of their 3d printers from a customer who doesn't own a 3d printer.
From my understanding the last time I looked into this the way it works is that the printed model inherits the license. That means you can't sell cc-noncommercial models directly, but if someone contracts a print shop and provides the model they can still pay someone to make it due to paying for a service and not that product.
Though print shops seem to flagrantly violate this anyway without much issue.
I think its a gray area that will always be dependent on the geography, lawyers, and the judge.