this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
1607 points (99.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

7615 readers
3372 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1607
Sweet Spot (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Those from the actual baby boom right after WW2 weren't

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Less than 4% of boomers served in Vietnam.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

This kind of seems like a meaningless statistic without some more context (such as what % of US citizens were boomers, and what % of US citizens served in Vietnam). On its own, it doesn't really say anything.

I think a more useful statistic would be the percent of people who served in Vietnam that were boomers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It matters because if you are going to say that a defining factor of that generation is that they went to Vietnam when less than 1/25 people did it’s misleading. It’s like saying that a defining factor of millennials was being in nyc when the twin towers went down

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Fair enough... I wasn't the one who said that, and I do not agree. Vietnam itself was a defining factor of the generation, but not "going to Vietnam"