this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
492 points (96.2% liked)

politics

23340 readers
2681 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

No he wasn’t.

Maybe being deported without seeing a judge

Did you not read my post?

He was ordered to be deported back home to El Salvador, and then a second judge confirmed he was to be deported on appeal.

He had already seen a judge TWICE in relation to being deported. Both times they ruled to deport him.

Pretty fucking self explanatory.

You're gonna have to explain because no, it's not. The 4 symbols were determined to mean MS13 (Marijuana, Smile, etc). It's a giant coincidence if they just happened to spell out MS13 but aren't MS13, especially given his history with MS13 gang members.

So? Elon musk was in the us illegally, should he be sent to el Salvador?

I'm pretty sure he was in the US legally on a visa and that whole "he was here illegally" thing has been debunked. If Musk was ruled by 2 judges to be MS13 and to be deported then yeah, he should be sent to el salvador. Even the el salvador president says that Garcia is MS13 for crying out loud.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Did you not read my post?

Unfortunately I did.

He was ordered to be deported back home to El Salvador, and then a second judge confirmed he was to be deported on appeal.

And he didn't see them.

The 4 symbols were determined to mean MS13 (Marijuana, Smile, etc). It's a giant coincidence if they just happened to spell out MS13 but aren't MS13, especially given his history with MS13 gang members.

It is a giant coincidence, because it actually means LDCB.

I'm pretty sure he was in the US legally on a visa and that whole "he was here illegally" thing has been debunked. If Musk was ruled by 2 judges to be MS13 and to be deported then yeah, he should be sent to el salvador. Even the el salvador president says that Garcia is MS13 for crying out loud.

Oh right, the "grey" are he said he was in, right completely debunked.

Also if he actually had a chance to see judge before being black bagged, at least it would be a little fair. And what a stupid take, also taking the El Salvadoran presidents word for it is dumb

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

And he didn’t see them.

He didn't see what? That he was ordered to be deported? Yes he did - he actually showed up to those court dates back in 2019 lol.

It is a giant coincidence, because it actually means LDCB.

lol so first everyone says that they don't mean anything, now they suddenly mean "LDCB"? Took you guys a few weeks to find something else you can try and claim they mean lol. Also google is turning up a blank for anything with garcia and LDCB.

Also if he actually had a chance to see judge before being black bagged, at least it would be a little fair.

What exactly do you think he needs to see ANOTHER judge for though?

In the country illegally? Check Citizen of El Salvador and only El Salvador? Check Determined to be a MS13 gang member? Check

What exactly do you think another court case would possibly do that the previous ones didn't? Seriously - what "due process" do you think someone who was twice ordered to be deported and determined to be a gang member missed out on when he got deported?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

He didn't see what? That he was ordered to be deported? Yes he did - he actually showed up to those court dates back in 2019 lol.

Uhuh and why is the administration calling his deportation an error?

lol so first everyone says that they don't mean anything, now they suddenly mean "LDCB"? Took you guys a few weeks to find something else you can try and claim they mean lol

Welcome to the world of sarcasm.

What exactly do you think he needs to see ANOTHER judge for though?

I don't know... due process?

In the country illegally? Check

How was his deportation an error then?

Determined to be a MS13 gang member? Check

Trumps insistence on the matter doesn't make it true

What exactly do you think another court case would possibly do that the previous ones didn't? Seriously - what "due process" do you think someone who was twice ordered to be deported and determined to be a gang member missed out on when he got deported?

Oh idk maybe because he deported in error?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Uhuh and why is the administration calling his deportation an error?

They're not - they're saying that there was an administrative error on his paperwork. ie a typo, put something in the wrong box, etc. NOT that he shouldn't have been deported.

I don’t know… due process?

WHAT DUE PROCESS? He was ordered by 2 separate judges to be deported. He was there at those court cases. What due process did he not get? What specifically do you think should happen if he is brought back to the US for "due process" to happen? For a third judge to rule yes he is MS13 and yes he should be deported, like the first 2?

How was his deportation an error then?

It wasn't, as I said above.

Trumps insistence on the matter doesn’t make it true

Trump has nothing to do with it. Trump wasn't the one that insisted he was an MS13 member. Trump wasn't either one of the judges back in 2019 who determined that he was MS13.

Oh idk maybe because he deported in error?

He wasn't.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

They're not - they're saying that there was an administrative error on his paperwork. ie a typo, put something in the wrong box, etc. NOT that he shouldn't have been deported.

So, ordering him to come back is what? Nothing?

Trump wasn't the one that insisted he was an MS13 member

Did you not see the interview? Lol

He wasn't

He was

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

So, ordering him to come back is what? Nothing?

The same people that ordered his deportation are not the same people ordering that they have to try and bring him back.

Did you not see the interview? Lol

Trump wasn't the one that made the ruling that he was MS13. That was done by immigration and 2 separate judges 6 years ago, and then confirmed by the president of el salvador when he asked for him to be sent there. Trump was presenting the facts that he was ruled to be MS13 by 2 separate Judges and immigration.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The same people that ordered his deportation are not the same people ordering that they have to try and bring him back

why are they ordering him back?

Trump wasn't the one that made the ruling that he was MS13. That was done by immigration and 2 separate judges 6 years ago, and then confirmed by the president of el salvador when he asked for him to be sent there.

And yet, that's not what happened.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

And yet, that’s not what happened.

It is though. What do you think happened?

why are they ordering him back?

Because they believe the stay of deportation overrides the illegal alien act that was used to deport him. That's up for debate, and hopefully will go through the courts to get a final ruling - though on the face of it it seems like it doesn't override it, so they were able to deport him.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It is though. What do you think happened?

It isn't though. You know what happened.

illegal alien act

Spoiler, the us isn't at war

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Spoiler, the us isn’t at war

Ok so you disagree with them invoking the act that legally allows them to deport these gang members. Now we're getting somewhere, and now we can see why you believe that "due process" wasn't followed.

It isn’t though. You know what happened.

What happened is what I said happened. If you disagree, feel free to explain what you think happened. If you don't/can't, then we'll assume that you agree with what I said happened.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Ok so you disagree with them invoking the act that legally allows them to deport these gang members. Now we're getting somewhere, and now we can see why you believe that "due process" wasn't followed.

He's not part of ms13 by any credible means.

What happened is what I said happened. If you disagree, feel free to explain what you think happened. If you don't/can't, then we'll assume that you agree with what I said happened.

Nope, what happened is what i said happened. I've said my part already, you're welcome to assume whatever you want, doesn't make it any more true

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

He’s not part of ms13 by any credible means.

2 separate judges/courts disagree with you, and somehow I think they probably had a bit more to work with than you do.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Right his finger tats. I forgot 🤣

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago

You think the 2 separate courts/judges decided he was MS13 in 2019 based just on those finger tattoos?