this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
139 points (100.0% liked)
chat
8384 readers
287 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
My friend pulled out her phone to ask chatGPT how to play a board game last night, and despite all of us yelling at her that chatGPT doesn't know anything, she persisted. Then the dumbass LLM made up some rules because it doesn't know anything.
If you tell people that ChatGPT doesn't know anything, they will only think you're obviously wrong when it gives them apparently correct answers. You should tell people the truth -- the harm in ChatGPT is that it is generally subtly wrong in some way, and often entirely wrong, but it always looks plausibly right.
Yea, that's definitely one of the worst aspects of AI is how confidently incorrect it can be. I had this issue using deep seek and had to turn on the mode where you can see what it's thinking and often it will say something like.
I can't analyze this properly, let's assume this.... Then confidently spits an answer out based on that assumption. At this point I feel like AI is good for 100 level CS students that don't want to do their homework and that's about it
Same, I just tried deepseek-R1 on a question I invented as an AI benchmark. (No AI has been able to remotely correctly answer this simple question, though I won't reveal what the question is here obviously.) Anyway, R1 was constantly making wrong assumptions, but also constantly second-guessing itself.
I actually do think the "reasoning" approach has potential though. If LLMs can only come up with right answers half the time, then "reasoning" allows multiple attempts at a right answer. Still, results are unimpressive.
one of my friends did the same thing and it provided incorrect information about the games rules lmao
Do you think they took home the lesson that llms don't possess knowledge or do reason?
Why would she take away that lesson? It produced a list of rules to the game that look approximately right.
Presumably her friends corrected her and showed her why the "generated" rules were incorrect... at least that's what I would expect of my friends
I hope so. You have to be patient in circumstances like that.
i fucking hope, but she didn't really pay much attention to us lol
Why do people do things like this? What is the point of playing a game with your friends if you won't listen to or pay attention to them?