chat

8384 readers

287 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

139

I hate it when I ask a question in a group and some mofo replies with “according to ChatGPT”. (hexbear.net)

submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

62 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Bitch if I wanted the robot, I’d ask it myself (well, I’d ask the Chinese one)! I’m asking you!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yea, that's definitely one of the worst aspects of AI is how confidently incorrect it can be. I had this issue using deep seek and had to turn on the mode where you can see what it's thinking and often it will say something like.

I can't analyze this properly, let's assume this.... Then confidently spits an answer out based on that assumption. At this point I feel like AI is good for 100 level CS students that don't want to do their homework and that's about it

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Same, I just tried deepseek-R1 on a question I invented as an AI benchmark. (No AI has been able to remotely correctly answer this simple question, though I won't reveal what the question is here obviously.) Anyway, R1 was constantly making wrong assumptions, but also constantly second-guessing itself.

I actually do think the "reasoning" approach has potential though. If LLMs can only come up with right answers half the time, then "reasoning" allows multiple attempts at a right answer. Still, results are unimpressive.