this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
1500 points (96.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

7488 readers
3248 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Nah, lets squash capitalism first.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, this attitude is downright suicidal for our species right now. Capitalism took centuries to develop. Anything that replaces it will form over a similar time scale. And with climate change, that is time we do not have.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I've got some bad news though. If our markets keep ignoring the environmental cost of... well, pretty much anything, as they always have, capitalism will also fuck us over in the long run. I've even heard it's already happening...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

~~Capitalists~~ People in just about every system ignore negative externalities, which are defined as costs borne by other people for the benefits that they receive themselves. Ironically, capitalism might be the best short-term solution, if only we had the political will. One of the major functions of government is to internalize negative externalities, via taxes and regulations. It's easy for a factory owner to let toxic effluent flow into the nearby river, but if it costs enough in taxes and fines, it's cheaper to contain it. We just need to use government regulations to make environmental damage cost too much money, and the market would take care of re-balancing economic activity to sustainable alternatives. The carbon tax is a well-known example of this technique, but we've seen how well that has gone over politically. Still, it's probably easier to push those kinds of regulations in a short time frame than to fundamentally revamp the entire system.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 hours ago

Lets squash it with batteries, they are heavy for a reason.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 hours ago

Not saying we shouldn’t do both, but in reality waiting to destroy capitalism before fixing the grid just means you have too much theory and not enough praxis.