this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
651 points (99.7% liked)

politics

22108 readers
3971 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sec. 2. Closing the Department of Education and Returning Authority to the States. (a) The Secretary of Education shall, to the maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law, take all necessary steps to facilitate the closure of the Department of Education and return authority over education to the States and local communities while ensuring the effective and uninterrupted delivery of services, programs, and benefits on which Americans rely.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 54 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

The Department of Education was established by Congress. Elimination of it will take an act of Congress. This man is the biggest puppet ever.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I think what we've seen is that Congress only has the powers that it uses. Sure, they could stop trump from nuking the DoE, but if they don't do shit, then it doesn't matter.

If you live in a state in the US, then you have a congress critter (multiple really) that represents you. Red, Blue, or independent, go to their town halls, go to their open forums, go to their offices, and tell them to do their fucking job. Whether that is officially closing the DoE, or preventing trump from doing it, they need to legislate it.

Edit:

https://www.congress.gov/members/find-your-member

You can look up your Senators and Rep here. Just called all 3 of my Congressmen and told them to do their jobs and legislate. I got through to my Rep's office (they're smaller and local) and left messages for both of my senators. All three are feckless republican shit-hawks, but at least I let them know they need to exercise the checks congress has, and that felt pretty good.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The law has always been a matter of what is or can be enforced, rather than what is written. Which is why it's been excruciating to listen to MAGA family members try to defend voting for reps who have been saying for years that they plan to eliminate the Social Security and Medicare on which those MAGAs depend. "They can't just do that! My tax dollars paid for it! And have you heard KaMAla's laugh??"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

I despise the ''he probably won't do that, he's a big talker'' Trump voters the most. You mean you can admit fully you don't want what he's selling, but you're still gonna vote for him. Fucking WHY.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Montesquieu knew what was up. If Donald declares himself King and we don't meaningfully say no as a society, then he's a king. The constitution isn't going to rise up out of its case and shoot atomic fire at him, it's just an old piece of paper that only matters insofar as we believe in it. And, well, [gestures around] I'd say that ship has pretty well sailed.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Why do you think they'll follow any sort of law or rule? Legitimate question.

They can tell everyone they're fired, change the locks/codes. Shutdown emails etc. and there is literally nobody that will stop them.

Except us with weaponry.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

the 2th amendment existing was no accident.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

This is the biggest argument to show that all that big talks about 2nd amendment was nothing but bullshit all along. US is in the middle of fascist takeover, and what good their 3 guns per human brought them? Are there any consequences for fascist dismantling the very fabric of democracy?
Turns out the only thing all that abundance of guns is good for are school shootings and elevated crime rates, nothing else.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like you should leave saying that for another year or 2. It's understandable that people aren't quite yet ready to abandon legal means.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

When the time to abandon legal means comes, it's already too late.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I mean yes, that's why you have to abandon legal means. Because it's too late.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 minutes ago

This is the whole problem. When it's too late, it's too late, definitionally. You can't do shit against full on authoritarian government. You can't do shit even if you have community. And you don't have community, Americans hate each other more than anything, and it turned out most of them aren't smart, so they're ripe for the picking for every asshole imaginable to fuck them sideways.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

...you know most of the gun squad is on his side, yeah?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago

I was assured on a numerous occasions, that there are legions of armed Marxists walking around, waiting for the glorious revolution to start or whatever. I guess, it's not exactly true either, huh