this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
93 points (89.7% liked)

Technology

62073 readers
4913 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I went on something like 50 dates with people that I found on online dating sites. This was between 2005 and 2007 (when I met my wife via Yahoo Personals.)

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah the OG OKCupid was incredible. Then it was bought out and became another swiping app.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh was OKCupid a non Tinder like app back then? Good to know

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes, they had a system where you answered questions about a wide range of topics, and answered what the ideal mate should say, then give a weight to how important that is for you. For example, you prefer chocolate over vanilla, and you want your mate to be the same, but it’s not an important factor. On the other hand, you prefer not to be a nazi, and it’s super important your mate isn’t one either. Also, there were IQ questions which allowed filtering out the stupid ones (like is the sun or the earth larger). Then the system would recommend profiles based on a match score computed from your answers. Really great. Got two relationships out of it, one is going 10 years today.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Adding onto this, it was totally free and you could just endlessly scroll through profiles, read them, look at their answers to questions, etc. No need to say "yes" or "no" to each profile judt to see the next one. And if you answered all of the personality questions (there were hundreds if not thousands) you were invited to become a site mod, which I did.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I met my fiancée on a dating app circa 2014

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And how much do you use dating apps now?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Considering I have a fiancée, never.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And that’s the point. When it works, they lose 2 customers forever.

It’s a filtering process that removes all the diamonds in the rough. All that’s left is the rough.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I mean that's definitely true and all, but wouldn't they also get a continuous fresh supply of single people (coming of age, breakups). Don't get me wrong I totally get they want that and to keep the users hooked as well, because they're greedy piggys, but still I don't know if the business model is doomed if they don't.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

The issue is if those new singles enter the rough zone (full of people who have not had much success) they’re going to have a very bad experience. Probably the best experience is for then to pair off against other new singles and depart. Some will end up doing that but others will end up stuck in the mud like everyone else.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I had a modicum of success on OKC. In 2013.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

That was because OKC had long form quizzes and in depth bios. It has been Tinderized and is no longer recognizable.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ditto - a date from OKC in 2012 led to my current marriage

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

And probably not my twentieth

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah. When they had to fight for their user base. Even Tinder was reasonably usable couple of years ago. It paired me with my current partner which must be considered a marvel of technology.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but by pairing you, it lost 2 users! That's counterintuitive to capitalism.

So if the AI works for the users, it will bring down the app.

If the AI works for the investors, people will get bad pairings and it will bring down the app.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hey, it's not "bad pairings", it's just a very good pairing (with fake AI profile) that "unfortunately" could never have a conversation outside the app

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Neuralink ftw lol.