Open Source

37004 readers

75 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

376

Proton's biased article on Deepseek (lemmy.ml)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

168 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Article: https://proton.me/blog/deepseek

Calls it "Deepsneak", failing to make it clear that the reason people love Deepseek is that you can download and it run it securely on any of your own private devices or servers - unlike most of the competing SOTA AIs.

I can't speak for Proton, but the last couple weeks are showing some very clear biases coming out.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I haven't actually used that one, but doesn't the same point apply here too? The whole point of DeepSeek is in distillation that makes runtime requirements smaller.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

No cause I was already running regular (non-deepseek) qwen 14B, admittedly a heavily quantized and uncensored version, so I was just curious if it would be any better