this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
1637 points (97.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

7954 readers
2722 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What's next, jehovian hospitals that'll refuse ppl blood transfusions? Maybe amish hospitals that'll treat 'em with 100% organic snake oil?

I mean, you're either a medical institution, and then you do whatever is legal to help the patient, or you're a sect, and then you tell ppl how they should live their lives according to a bunch of long-dead dudes. Not both.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I would say, morality always comes into play when you decide which actions are permissible and which are not when it comes to healthcare, from designing legislation and hospital policy, to decisions doctors take on the spot, whether it is secular morality or religious(for example, many people oppose euthanasia, and not necessarily for religious reasons). I see no reason to discredit catholics and their moral views, I respect them, and see the appeal and logic of condemning abortion, even if personally I am not a catholic.

What makes your morality better than religious morality?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What makes your morality better than religious morality?

My morality doesn't involve covering up sexual abuse of minors, for one.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Christian morality quite clearly does not involve that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Not officially, no. But it sure seems to happen a lot for people who want to police how others have sex.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'd say it's more about letting ppl choose what they do with their body and their lives in general, as long as it doesn't hurt the others. I can be against abortions or euthanasia, yet it's not me who's going to suffer the childbirth/dementia/terminal cancer/etc.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I agree, but I would rather catholic institutions are not forced to act in accordance with a moral system they do not believe in. Since your country leaves healthcare up to the free market, it is not commited to make sure everyone gets all the services the could possibly want, but it is not preventing it either. You can open an abortion clinic near a catholic hospital if there is demand. The solution to this should not be forcing catholics to do abortions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

I agree, but I would rather catholic institutions are not forced to act in accordance with a moral system they do not believe in.

No one's forcing them to practice medicine, then.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Catholics and their views are perfectly fine so long as they don't interfere with other people's lives. Simple as.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Only your views are allowed to interfere with other's lives?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Only the laws of a secular, liberal democratic and pluralistic state, with rule of law and universal respect for human rights are allowed to interfere with people's lives, to the extent that said interference adheres to the social contract.

If you think this makes me somehow a hypocrite, go cry me a river.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

But how can you not interfere with the lives of other people? Shold I go live in the woods? If I am a private company, how much agency do I need to have to avoid interfering with the lives of other people?

Interesting word you have there, "pluralistic". Do you reckon catholics will have a say in what laws are passed?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

But how can you not interfere with the lives of other people? Shold I go live in the woods? If I am a private company, how much agency do I need to have to avoid interfering with the lives of other people?

Follow the law.

Interesting word you have there, "pluralistic". Do you reckon catholics will have a say in what laws are passed?

Democracy means democracy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Catholics do have a say in what laws are passed, tho. And it's kinda intended.

Basically, they're outnumbered by those who think abortions are ok, yet it's not good enough for them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There is a difference between accepting the results of a democratic process(which they do, I suppose) and doing abortions yourself even though you don't legally have to and believe it to be immoral. Your judgmental attitude is misplaced.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Quit whining. Many catholic-majority countries have legal abortion. If church-controlled institutions don't want to provide the full spectrum of healthcare, they have two options: fold operations altogether or relinquish church control. If you are curious what that looks like, come visit us in Quebec.