this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
67 points (86.8% liked)

science

14352 readers
260 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Website has too many ads, not clicking.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

and isn't GDPR compliant.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The best part is it was just copied from another site, at least it was cited. I sent to the site and it said the article is based on an article from another source.

Here's the true source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06633-0.pdf

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How do you know if you didn't click

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Because I’ve clicked on it many times before and it is wicked toxic.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

I see wired and my immidiate thought is, whatever the article is, it's not worth it.