3DPrinting
3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.
The r/functionalprint community is now located at: [email protected] or [email protected]
There are CAD communities available at: [email protected] or [email protected]
Rules
-
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
-
Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
-
No porn (NSFW prints are acceptable but must be marked NSFW)
-
No Ads / Spamming / Guerrilla Marketing
-
Do not create links to reddit
-
If you see an issue please flag it
-
No guns
-
No injury gore posts
If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)
Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible
view the rest of the comments
Agree with solution in this case, but where does this statistic come from? I find this fact surprising. I would have guessed most people do use the slicer for modification and professionals and more experienced enthusiasts make up those that don't.
It's because the slicer is basically just CAM software for additive manufacturing. If you are using CAM software in subtractive CNC, you wouldn't use the cam software to modify the part, you'd modify it in CAD. The slicer just simply isn't the tool to use for part modification.
I’d assume not, actually.
Might be something most newer-to-the-hobby might try, but once you get comfortable with modelers… the limitations be come obvious.
For example tapering registration pegs. If you’re slicing along the xy plane, then your pegs will be vertical, but this sounds like the part is too large in either YZ or XZ, making the overhanging posts… problematic.