this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
167 points (97.2% liked)

News

23664 readers
2541 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 153 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Key facts about Jury Trials:

  1. Jurors cannot be punished for their decison either "guilty" or "not guilty", no matter if the decision was the "right" or "wrong" decison.

  2. A verdict of "not guilty" cannot be appealed nor overturned.

  3. A person cannot be tried for the same criminal act more than once. Famously known as the "No Double Jeopardy" clause. (although: according to the law, mistrials / hung juries don't count as a trial for the purposes of "No Double Jeopardy")

Interpret these facts however you will. wink wink, nudge nudge

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

something like the casey anthony trial comes to mind though. the jury wanted to convict but needed to act objectively on evidence alone. so they all cringed and cried as they all signed off to acquit or whatever. this would be the opposite, but the idea is the same.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Different.

A "guilty" verdict that a judge deems to be lacking evidence and result in the judge giving their verdict that overrides the jury's. It could also get appealed. So there's no point of the "guilty" version of Jury Nullification.

In contrast, a "not guilty" verdict cannot be overrulled by the judge, nor can it be appealed. So this version of Jury Nullification is much stronger.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Jury nullification is one way to overturn unfair laws.

If a bunch of juries refuse to play ball, prosecutors will stop trying the cases. They think convictions are the only way to win reelection.

I'm an advocate for homeless people. I 100% support jury nullification.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, we'd probably want to keep murder illegal. It's just this specific murder we don't take issue with.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Can we crowd source ads around Manhattan and have people with bullhorns on the sidewalks around the court entrances announcing "Jury Nullification is your right!"?

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Just to be clear, Jury Nullification isn't a right, more of a natural consequence of the 2 rules:

Jury can't be punished for not ruling a certain way

And

No double jeopardy.

You can't outlaw jury nullification without breaking the first rule and you can't break the first rule because it's absolutely necessary for a fair justice system

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A judge can overrule a jury if they think the jury judged the law rather than the defendant, however.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Only for a guilty verdict, a non-guilty verdict can't be overrode or appealed.

That's why they hate juries knowing about it so much

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

True, but from the perspective of a juror, it may as well be a right, and calling it a right gets the point across much more efficiently than trying to explain in detail.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

It's not just a consequence, it's the entire reason we have juries in the first place. Do you honestly think 12 random untrained people can judge if someone violated a law better than a traines judge holding a bench trial? Juries are always going to be inferior at applying the letter of the law than any trained judge.

The only value of a jury is that it protects against unjust laws. The original idea was that, regardless of what laws the wealthy write, you still need to be able to convince 12 ordinary people that a crime worthy of punishment has taken place.

Jury nullification isn't just some quirky consequence of the jury system; it's the entire reason we have juries in the first place. We've just collectively forgotten that fact.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We have a fair justice system?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Theoretically. The structure is setup for one, it's the individuals that fuck it up. As usual.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Fuck the judges, corrupt

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago

Well, according to citizens united, money = speech.

[–] [email protected] 87 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Also, don't tell anyone you know that, or you're not gonna be on any jury.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Actually? Having a get out of jury duty free card seems like a handy thing to have.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 weeks ago

cough cough ^jury ^nullification cough

Sorry, there must be something in the air today.