this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
305 points (98.7% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6623 readers
517 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

By the way, does anybody have a credible take on the current status/outlook of the war?

I hear nothing about the Kursk offense now, but mainstream news mention recent Russian successes in the East. I understand striking deep into Russia with US weapons would be critical, but I think that is unlikely to happen before the elections.

I am (again) worried for Ukraine, and to our Western politicians f*cking this up.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I love yall but yall gotta stop doing this in NCD. Is there a more credible community yall can have these discussions in? We're here for jokes and shitposting. Real, honest, fact-based discussions (especially involving politics) really don't belong here. [email protected] might be a better fit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, nuke that serious post from orbit!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No answer received here should be trusted regardless how credible it sounds anyway, you may as well ask ChatGPT how the war is going, you'll get a similar level of trustability

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

To be fair that is also true of the other online communities that take themselves more seriously.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I dont actually know how trustworthy this site is, but it is nice for getting a visual view of the front lines. https://liveuamap.com/

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

This was not the

By the way does anybody

I was hoping for

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

The Russians are throwing everything at the salient, it's brutal and costly and the Ukrainians probably won't be able to hold too long.

But it also did it's job: it was a target Russia HAD to take back, and it bought a few months for the American equipment to come online.

What is really needed is Russian territory authorization, and the election to be over so there's less doubt of continued supply, and new weapons packages can be drawn up.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You can sign up for ISW’s newsletter, they do a good job of reporting what’s going on from a fairly dry, but western perspective. Last I saw they were reporting that Russia is aggressively counter attacking in Kursk to attempt to dislodge the Ukrainians before the fall mud sets in. It’s not looking great on the front but there are quite a few indications that the Russian attacks are not sustainable long-term. That said, I’ve seen reports saying that for a while now and the grinding attrition has continued.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Incredible. 74 sources on their latest piece and almost all Telegram, and some Facebook.

Key takeaways (@[email protected]):

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

People have been saying that basically from day one yet the Russians keep coming. Obviously this isn't sustainable long term but nobody knows how long they can keep going.