this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3689 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“The president has been adamant that we need to restore Roe. It is unfathomable that women today wake up in a country with less rights than their ancestors had years ago,” Fulks said.

Biden has been poised to run on what has been described as the strongest abortion rights platform of any general election candidate as he and his allies look to notch a victory in the first presidential election since Roe v. Wade was overturned in 2022.

Last month, Biden seized on a case in Texas, where a woman, Kate Cox, was denied an abortion despite the risk to her life posed by her pregnancy.

“No woman should be forced to go to court or flee her home state just to receive the health care she needs,” Biden said of the case. “But that is exactly what happened in Texas thanks to Republican elected officials, and it is simply outrageous. This should never happen in America, period.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

He did cut the cost of insulin, and it kicked in Jan 1st.

He did push student loan forgiveness and the SCOTUS knocked it down after a Republican lawsuit.

More.... https://www.theatlantic.com/podcasts/archive/2023/10/why-dont-bidens-political-wins-register-with-voters/675547/

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Your link doesn't mention the word insulin once...

So I googled it...

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/biden-insulin-epipen/

Apparently trump is the one who's did that, and Biden stopped it as soon as he took office.

And two years later, Biden stopped obstructing it, and now wants credit for that like he made it happen?

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/03/02/fact-sheet-president-bidens-cap-on-the-cost-of-insulin-could-benefit-millions-of-americans-in-all-50-states/

That's a terrible example of Biden getting stuff done...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They're referring to the $35 monthly insulin cap contained within Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. Perhaps the Department of Health and Human Services is a good enough source for you?

Effective January 1, 2023, out-of-pocket costs for insulin are capped at $35 per monthly prescription among Medicare Part D enrollees under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). A similar cap takes effect in Medicare Part B on July 1, 2023.

https://aspe.hhs.gov/reports/insulin-affordability-ira-data-point

Bit of advice: If you're not familiar with a situation, you should do deeper research than a quick Google search and stopping the moment you find an unrelated article that affirms your bias.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

We stopped the price gouging on insulin!

For a subset of Medicare recipients.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That subset is actually about 1 in 8 insulin users, so I imagine those people are pretty happy about it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago

Another win for Boomers. Hurrah.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's a perfect example of what centrists want us to give Biden credit for.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's straight up sociopathic to expect people to be grateful Biden only obstructed it for two years because it was Trump's idea.

Like, trump is obviously a giant piece of shit.

But it's even worse to stop one of the handful of good things he did for years and then expect people clap when you step aside and let it happen.

Really highlights just how little Biden has actually accomplished when this is what they have left it hold up as an accomplishment

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It draws into question all the other things they list as "accomplishments," like giving him sole credit for the UAW's accomplishments because he showed up for a photo op.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago

And he only showed up because Fain threatened to not endorse Biden.

Fuck Joe Biden. Fain for president.