this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
6 points (80.0% liked)

politics

19088 readers
3581 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

If Biden reschedules (or even better legalizes — I know this is a larger challenge legally) cannabis and takes a harder stance against Israel, I think he would win most of the key states he needs to win the election. Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Nevada, Michigan, Arizona, and to a lesser degree Georgia will determine this election. The rest of the states are locked in. A 1% swing can mean the difference to prevent a dictatorship.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If the DNC had a backbone it wouldn't be Biden to begin with.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

You mean if they were stupid enough to try nominating any of the candidates Biden beat 4 years ago? Stupid enough to gamble on a new candidate, ignoring the fact Biden already beat Trump once? Stupid enough to ignore the fact the fact that the incumbent president more often than not wins reelection?

You're right, democracy is on the line, now's the best time to fucking gamble it away.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"now's" as good a time as any

"this time for sure"

"can't believe how easily this will be to beat trump"

"better of 2 evils! don't worry we'll just go further left in 4 years :)"

"oopsie dead babies :("

[repeats ad nauseam until the libs are dead or go further right]

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

don’t worry we’ll just go further left in 4 years :)”

But we did. The Inflation Reduction Act was not only the most climate friendly bill in US history, it bolstered domestic green energy companies so much that Canada and Europe had to pass similar legislation to stay competitive (and keep companies from relocating).

The unfortunate fact of the matter is that Israel is going to keep killing babies, and the US president is going to support Israel, no matter who it is, for the foreseeable future.

Your choice is if you'll willingly accept the burden and do whatever you can nonetheless to help the most people domestically and globally -- or if you'll pretend you aren't carrying the burden, and you're willing to throw women, black Americans, brown Americans, gay Americans, trans Americans, etc under the bus to maintain that delusion.

No matter what you do, if you pay taxes in the US, you're funding infanticidal Israeli weapons. Democracy is shitty like that. The majority of people are uncomfortable with all the civilian deaths, but a majority still wants to fund weapons for them. Don't like it? Grit your teeth, try to make a difference, and minimize any unnecessary support to Israel.

There will be no leftist utopia except from the labor of blood soaked hands from those who understand there's no other choice. I can only hope that one day my kids or their kids will be able to judge me without any hypocrisy, because we successfully made a world free of these awful realities.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I can only hope that one day my kids or their kids will be able to

Libs over here acting like they're going to have GRANDkids let alone kids. SMFH

Burn down the MIC

There is no other way

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

In case you're wondering, for future reference, the reason why you never seem to find progressives who'll vote for Biden or support the mainstream Democrat candidate is because when we try to earnestly explain our viewpoint and how we think we can help the most people, we just run into non serious memelords.

But on the bright side, it wasn't wasted time on my part. People still saw what I had to say, and you made it look all the wiser. Shame that you've only continued to drain supporters from your "burn it down" caucus though.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You still live in a delusion that playing by their rules will somehow fix any of this shit (not to mention the selfish act of having 2 generations into WWIII)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Playing by their rules may not be the fastest or most efficient way to fix our problems, but it is the method that will hurt the fewest innocent and poor people along the way. I refuse to sacrifice the working class so that we can save the working class. Especially since human nature is likely to just make modest improvements for the working class and just establish a new ruling class.

You really need to lighten up a bit. Are we headed for turmoil? Yes. But are we headed for mass human extinction and world war? Likely not.

Having kids is what forces society to be selfless. I find myself willing to personally sacrifice a whole lot for today's youth, and I don't have any kids of my own. I'm probably not going to reap the full rewards of our efforts to fix climate change. The kids are though. Children force us to have hope for the future, that things can get better, because it makes us want things to get better. I want my trials and tribulations today to only be in textbooks in the future.

Once again, you need to lighten up. You've lost sight of what you're even fighting for. You aren't trying to save or help people, you're trying to win against the capitalists at all costs. Without the former, the latter just makes you a different flavor of them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Going to tell you: History is not kind to leftists who kowtow to Fascists because they’ll “burn it down” (Look up Social Fascism)

They end up with bullets in their heads rather than glorious revolution.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

All I see is you boot-licking for the USA's genocide 🤷‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Ah yes, pointing out historical facts is bootlicking. You’re not a serious person.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Don't underestimate domestic pro-Israel agents' ability to assassinate a US politician's political career. Lemmy is not the American media, and the latter is still largely supporting Israel's campaign.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Wow that's some straight up antisemitism right there. Sorry, but there isn't some secret Jewish Cabal controlling the world.

Go outside and touch some grass, ok?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Hi there. Jewish person here. The people you are accusing of being antisemitic are 100% right. AIPAC has controlled the American political stance on Israel for decades.

If you care about American Jews, stop associating them with Israel. That is what is getting us harassed and attacked, being automatically associated with Israel.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yeah this is the internet and I can claim that I'm a Palestinian that thinks that Netanyahu is completely in the right. Which proves what exactly?

Also note that racism towards "Cosmopolitan Jews" was a way a certain group used as a gateway for people that weren't willing to be antisemitic towards all Jews. But we know how that ended.

So today it's considered to be good and correct to hate "zionist jews" by those who would normally think antismeitsm is wrong. Meanwhile in my city there's an Israeli consullate, but the protesters don't go there, they protest in the middle of a Jewish community, and have attempted to burn down Jewish businesses. While you're distinguishing between "~~cosmopolitan~~ zionist jews" and other jews, there are many people in the Palestinian movement who are not.

We need to stop looking the other way about what this is really about. An antisemitic movement that wants to restore the ethnic makeup of a geographic area to the way it was in a history book by the use of extreme violence. "Blood and soil", "from the river to the sea" same shit different century.

I'm not a Jew but my grandfather fought in a war against people that did the same things the Palestinian movement is doing right now. Jews went along with the movement my grandfather fought against too, you know. So the same bullshit from a century ago and how it affected my grandfather means a bit more than your unverifiable claims about being a jew. This ain't about you, this is about fascists trying to burn down Jewish businesses in the city I live in after my grandfather sacrificed a lot to fight against that kind of evil.

Now go on and make excuses for the violent actions of the fascists in your movement like a good useful idiot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You are welcome to look at my comment history and see how many other times I have talked about being Jewish.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I really don't care. There were Jews that joined the Nazi party. Historically being Jewish hasn't exactly been a prophylactic against being a part of antisemitic movements. You may think you can win over the violent elements in a movement to only hate a subset of Jews so you'll be fine. But when there's a night of the long knives you find out only the opinions of those with the knives really count in these kinds of movements. And they aren't going to care that you were "one of the good ones" when the knives come out.

They already don't seem to care what kind of Jew goes to the synagogues they shoot at.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So first I'm not a Jew and now I'm a Jewish Nazi?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

On the internet nobody knows you're a dog.

You can be whatever you want to be. Not sure why you're playing the role of useful idiot for an antisemitic movement, but if you want that to be your internet persona, then no one can stop you. Just like no one can stop me from pretending from posting what I want even if I might be a dog in real life. Woof!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

A lot of people think that how they identify makes them magically immune to propaganda. The reality is thinking you can't be scammed because of who you are makes you more vulnerable to being scammed.

"I'm a good ole country boy, some city slicker can't fool me!" says the guy voting for Trump.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Got it, so I'm a Nazi Jew who's a useful antisemite. Fascinating.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

The only sane comment in this entire thead.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sigh.

Saying there's a strong pro-Israel lobby is not antisemitism.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sigh.

Promoting conspiracy theories involving Jews being puppet masters that control your government is textbook Goebbels kind of shit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They weren't claiming that jews are puppet master overlords that control our governments

They were claiming that Israel has a strong political lobby that can do a lot of political damage to politicians that don't align themselves with Israel.

They do this by doing exactly what you're doing. Claiming or implying that anybody against Israel or the pro-Israel lobby is an antisemite.

I'll remind you that "jewish people" and "Israel" are not the same thing.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I’ll remind you that “jewish people” and “Israel” are not the same thing.

You need to tell that to the people that are shootiing at synogogues, trying to burn down jewish businesses. There is a Pro-Palestinian movement in my city that are protesting a Jewish community instead of protesting the Israeli consulate that's in this city. Maybe tell them they should be protesting the consulate not the jewish communtiy because they don't seem as enlightened as you are to understand the distinction between Israel and Jews in other countries.

But you aren't going to do that, are you? Could upset your friends in your movement if you criticize their actions.

The Palestinian movement has proven the need for a group to lobby for the well being of Jews in the US. If you won't speak out against the antisemitic activity that's occurring in the Palestinian movement because you're too busy spreading conspiracy theories on the internet, then yeah there needs to be some group that's able to talk about these issues to those in power that are able to protect communities that are in danger from your allies in your movement.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I never said antisemitism doesn't exist. Neither did the person above. Nor did anybody else.

You're bringing that up now as a distraction. Criticising the actions of the regime in Israel, a regime that has openly stated they want to see the eradication of all Palestinians, is not antisemitism.

"My" friends in "my movement"? What are you talking about? I'm not involved in a movement against Jewish people.

If you're referring to me being against the genocide being carried out by Israel, then yes, I'm against that.

But it's not really a "movement", it's the default. I guess with that line of thinking I'm a part of all kinds of "movements" - the "anti-paedophilia movement", the "I don't like kale movement", the "people who think alligators are scary movement", the "people who dislike chores movement", etc.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Also, I genuinely don't think most Americans care all that much to the degree it would affect their support of Biden.

I'm struggling to think of anyone I know who is so upset about Israel they would consider throwing the country to Trump, and I know a lot of people that have very strong opinions on Israel.

It just doesn't track. If you're against Israel's actions, you're probably also not keen on fascism, racism, and authoritarianism...so logically, you're not keen on letting Trump win.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

According to the census, 1.1% of Americans are Muslim and many Muslim leaders are encouraging their base not to vote for Biden. They aren’t voting for Trump either but since Muslims lean heavily democrat, a non vote is the same as voting for Trump in a swing state. It isn’t that they want Trump and authoritarianism, it’s that they are protesting against the US support for Israel.

Source: https://apnews.com/article/muslim-swing-state-biden-vote-fb3b93f465ed6fd34a901c269a084a90

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Well that there is a failure of Muslim leadership.

Hatred is often a self destructive thing. Not voting for Biden increases the probability that Trump will win which will be a very bad thing for Muslims in the US. So they're willing to cause themselves harm over their hatred of Israel.

Maybe it's time people stop listening to leaders that want to sacrifice the people they lead to make themselves look like strong men?