Asklemmy

43847 readers

696 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

What other actions were scientists so preoccupied with whether or not they could, that they didn't stop to think if they should? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 51 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Nuclear bazooka

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davy_Crockett_(nuclear_device)

But I would like to say that it’s rarely the scientists pushing the morally corrupt inventions. It’s the suits

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

In a similar vein, Project Pluto. Essentially a nuclear ramjet that could fly 150m off the ground at 3,700 km/h, was impossible to intercept at the time, could carry sixteen nuclear warheads and crop-dusted the earth with radiation everywhere it went. It was eventually cancelled for being "too provocative." Which, coming from the US army, is quite a thing lol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

The people over at NCD must be getting raging hardons just from seeing this.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This seems like a rather self-defeating weapon really.

How was that weapon supposed to work? "Stay back or we will irradiate our own forces". It's not much of a threat is it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

The yield is small enough that it isn’t a threat to the soldiers launching it. Still, I wouldn’t want to be the one tasked with firing it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

"Do you want this territory? Because we can give you this territory..."

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Holy shit, the Fatman from Fallout is real ‽

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

If you’re ever in Albuquerque, New Mexico you can see it in the nuclear museum (can’t recall what it’s specifically called)