this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
313 points (85.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

19585 readers
1027 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
313
It's easier to remember the IPs of good DNSes, too. (lemmy.sdf.org)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
187 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Today in our newest take on "older technology is better": why NAT rules!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (5 children)

If all that is true, then why do I still hate ipv6 so much.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

For me is because it’s so fucking slow. As soon as I disable ipv6 on every device it has better speeds.

IPv6 is trash.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Google's data shows that IPv6 is usually faster. Their metrics show an average of 10ms less latency over IPv6 in the USA and Canada: https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html#tab=per-country-ipv6-adoption

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

Tell that to your ISP which has fucked their IPv6 deployment up. In my experience IPv6 is actually faster since it bypasses the IPv4 CGNAT.

On busy days my IPv4 connection can get as slow as 15KB/s, now that's trash.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Lol that's ridiculous. There's nothing about ipv6 that'd make it any slower

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

There's one practical thing. Routers have had years to optimize IPv4 routing, which has to be redone for IPv6. Same with networking stacks in general.

In theory, IPv6 should be faster by not having to do bullshit like CGNAT. There's every reason to think it'll match that advantage if we just make it happen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

That doesn't make it "trash".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

In the USA, around 50% of Google traffic and 60% of Facebook traffic goes over IPv6. The largest mobile carriers in the US are nearly entirely IPv6-only too (customers don't get an IPv4 address, just an IPv6 one), using 464XLAT to connect to legacy IPv4-only servers. I'm sure we'd know if routing with IPv6 was slower. Google's data actually shows 10ms lower latency over IPv6: https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html#tab=per-country-ipv6-adoption

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago

I assume the normal fear of unknown things. It is hard to hate ipv6 once you have equivalent competence in ipv4 and ipv6.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

What is localhost now again...

Edit, remember you could use 127.0.0.1, but then it was changed to like 127.0.0.1......something....ff

So guess I was wrong :-) thanks for the info!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'd bet it's this little bugger " : "

It is for me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

The : is ok. I dont struggle with the shortening part. I struggle the "everything else" part.