this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
709 points (96.0% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3607 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 32 points 7 months ago (4 children)

This is one of those stories that I have to apply the filter of: STOP GIVING THIS WINDBAG AIR.

He says this shit on purpose to get a rise out of stupid people that hate him. It keeps him in the news in areas he would normally drop to the wayside. Say what you will about his mental acuity or emotional intelligence, the man knows how to stay in the spotlight.

I can't think of a better situation to apply the treehouse of horror/Paul Anka maxim: Just don't look.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Guarantee void in Tennessee!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

STOP GIVING THIS WINDBAG AIR.

BUT HE'S THE FRONTRUNNER FOR THE PRESIDENCY

Its not like Trump just goes away if you stop paying attention to him.

I can’t think of a better situation to apply the treehouse of horror/Paul Anka maxim: Just don’t look.

That worked as a punchline to anthropomorphic ad monsters doing spoofs and goofs in a cartoon. It isn't advice that's neatly transferable to chief executives in positions of immense power and privilege. I can't ignore Donald Trump any more than I can ignore Elon Musk or Mark Zuckerberg, because I am constantly surrounded by the consequences of their decisions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

And this one is... so utterly pointless...

So he says he looks like Elvis, big deal. He's full of himself so it should be no surprise that he has an unrealistically optimistic self-image. As far as things goes, this is so utterly harmless.

So ok, have a chuckle that he is way off base, but trying to use this as evidence of "dementia"? There's so much better to go on and this silliness doesn't even rate on the scale. I could easily imagine a 30 year old Trump saying the same delusional thing but without thinking "diminished mental faculties".

When there's media hysterics about something as benign as this, it lends credence to the voice of critics that the media is just crazily, irrationally going after Trump. Meanwhile, there's an endless flow of really damning stuff to fixate on without having to 'stretch' to discuss something like this.

Like with Obama, at least I understood why the conservatives had to go nuts about a tan suit or a fist bump, Obama just didn't provide much fodder for them to work with. Resorting to about the equivalent with Trump seems completely needless.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Idk, the dude has been showing signs of advancing dementia for a few years now.

I think we're at most a few months from him sundowning on live TV. If his heart lasts that long, that is.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

I'll generally agree, but at least based on this article, I wouldn't say "I think I look like Elvis" to be a matter of diminishing mental capacity, it's just unjustified narcissism.

There's so much other things to illustrate mental capacity issues that I feel like we shouldn't feel compelled to rope this into that neighborhood. That just serves to discredit the criticism.