this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
172 points (98.9% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3077 readers
1164 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

three claimed to have been too intoxicated to know who was driving

Then they can all share the same maximum punishment.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It doesn't work like that. You can't just punish people without probable cause. America isn't hasn't turned that Fascist yet. You need to prove who was driving first before you can punish them. Without probable cause, there is no justice.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Lol, America has a long proud history of punishing a lot of people with much less probable causes than 'the drunk DUI having car owner in his own car confirmed/confessed drunk at the time the car hit the cyclist was probably driving the car'.

Edit: Oh - you were prob replying for the case they would all share the punishment, my bad - I was trying to say that there is a probable cause one of them drove & that the system should have chosen (the most probable) one. It 100% would if it was a high-profile case.