this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

3975 readers
128 users here now

Good memes, bad memes, unite towards a united front.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Your contention is that Stalin committed no genocide? What do you call it, sparkling ethnic cleansing?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Do you call the Dust Bowl and Great Depression a genocide? Words have meaning.

You love to present overdramatic accusations when a famine occurs in a socialist country, and there’s usually only one big one.

Edit: If you’re talking about something else, please elaborate as to your specific allegation. ~~I asked you for a source earlier and you didn’t respond.~~

Edit 2: I stand corrected; I conflated you with a different user, but I’d still appreciate your source. Unfortunately, due to the lateness of this edit, the instance admins have already banned you, so I probably won’t find this out.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You didn't ask me for shit earlier. This is my first comment here.

The Dust Bowl and Great Depression is a thing that happened. What occurred in Stalin's reign is a pattern, that included famines. Were the famines specifically engineered to kill off specific groups? I don't know. But when you take a holistic view, and look at executions, gulag assignments, forced resettlement, deportations, and, yes, famines, there was very clearly a genocide under Stalin.

Millions of people died as a direct result of Stalin's policies and actions. I don't know if they were all with intent, but many definitely were.

I don't understand how anyone can defend Stalin. I guess people deny the Holocaust too, so there's that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess people deny the Holocaust too, so there’s that.

By trying to paint the Soviet Union as genocidal, you are denying the Holocaust. Simple as.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Woof, that's some leap.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Prisoners in the United States jumped from 120,284 in 1923 to 210,418 in 1933. (Source (p. 210))

Executions increased to 197, the highest number in US history, in 1935. (Source)

The U.S. forcibly deported one million of its own citizens to Mexico in the 1930s. Source

Since you’re probably using an intentionally ridiculous US estimate, I’ll use an intentionally ridiculous Russian estimate and say that seven million people died from the Great Depression. This Russian estimate uses the same intentionally ridiculous methodology of the U.S. one.

Put together, why isn’t this enough to declare that a genocide happened in the U.S.?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nice whataboutism. But fuck it, I'll bite. A genocide has absolutely happened in the US, funny that you didn't hit on it.

Let's play a game. I'm going to call it, "can we agree on some basic facts?"

Stalin, through his policies and leadership, killed millions of Soviet citizens. True or false?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

funny that you didn’t hit on it.

Apologies for the confusing wording above. That’s because I was comparing two similar events to see if you would call it a genocide when the U.S. did it. If you did, I’d question your definition of genocide, but at least accept you’re applying it consistently.

I absolutely agree with you on that basic fact — the US has engaged in countless successful genocides against indigenous peoples.

Stalin, through his policies and leadership, killed millions of Soviet citizens.

False.

First of all, to attribute deaths solely to one individual (even to Hitler) denies anyone else responsible of their free will in doing so.

@[email protected], would you mind holding this lib up to scrutiny since the one on Hexbear didn’t respond?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

First of all, to attribute deaths solely to one individual (even to Hitler) denies anyone else responsible of their free will in doing so.

Fair, but this is just kind of a thing we do with language.

If we can't agree that millions of people in the USSR were killed, sent to gulags, and died of famine during Stalin's leadership, then I'm not sure there's anything worth discussing.

Similarly, the article you linked about 7 million US deaths in the great depression doesn't even take itself seriously. It's just trying to discredit counts for deaths in the Holodomor. I suspect you don't think that many people died as a result of the great depression, and, if you're not going to argue in good faith, then again I believe we are at an impasse.

Finally, there is no need for name-calling. While I do not consider "lib" nearly as much an insult as you likely intend it, I would still not categorize myself as such.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If we can't agree that millions of people in the USSR were killed, sent to gulags, and died of famine during Stalin's leadership

Can we agree that millions of people in the USA were killed, sent to gulags, and died of famine during FDR's leadership?

I suspect you don't think that many people died as a result of the great depression

And do you think that people died during the Holodomor?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's crazy - we all actually tend to agree on most things. We all sort of agree that the US government has committed atrocities, that wealth redistribution is what we should be striving for, that billionaires suck, that universal healthcare is good, all that good shit.

But they are stuck on the idea that their favorite governments can do no wrong.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“I agree that the U.S. is evil and has been the objective bad guy in every war it’s ever been in (and the US has almost never not been at war) but I believe the U.S. wholeheartedly in matters of foreign policy”

Of course they can do wrong. We acknowledge legitimate criticisms, but we’re going to refute slander against socialist governments.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you compartmentalize counties in war to "good guys" and "bad guys", you're really going to claim that the US was the bad guy in WW2?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I apologize for the bad terminology, but I’ll stick with it to answer your question. Even in WW2, the Soviets were the “good guys” and the US only intervened when it was obvious the Soviets would win to stop a communist Europe.