this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
553 points (92.6% liked)

World News

39011 readers
2792 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm still waiting for that link, FYI.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A neutral news outlet like Reuters generally won't apply characterisations like "genocide" themselves - they'll report on the ICJ ruling.

In the meantime, we can apply the UN definition the ICJ uses, or the dictionary definition for ourselves. That makes things very clear.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If Reuters is that person's source for his claims of genocide yet Reuters said no such thing, Reuters is not his source.

This is the problem I having. You guys are throwing all these respected names around to make your case, but when asked for the source, it's always "well of course they don't actually say genocide but all the reporting in totality equals genocide."

So sure, how about you post here the ICJ definition of genocide and explain how the Oct. 7 war meets the definition.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Raz Segal, the program director of genocide studies at Stockton University, concretely says it is a “textbook case of genocide.” Segal believes that Israeli forces are completing three genocidal acts, including, “killing, causing serious bodily harm, and measures calculated to bring about the destruction of the group.” He points to the mass levels of destruction and total siege of basic necessities—like water, food, fuel, and medical supplies—as evidence. Source

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So you are saying this person's source is a scholar at a university yet they claimed it was Reuters to make it sound more legitimate?

Why would they do that.

Also if one scholar is enough to establish genocide, is 2 scholars enough to establish it isn't genocide?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No. You’re right. We should wait until the conflict is over and we can get boots on the ground to do a proper investigation before we decide if what Israel is doing meets the definition of a word. It’s so much easier to define things once everyone’s dead.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure I follow the context here.

You might be responding to the wrong comment chain. This is why you should respond to comments as they come into your inbox history, not spamming the comments of people through their comment feed.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm beginning to suspect I am talking to a bot.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A people are being genocided yet they have a bot army?

Every point you cede just opens up more questions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

...

Well now it's clear I am dealing with a bot or outright bad faith actor.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I knew you were clueless from your first comment. And I didn’t need a consensus.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago

That was a pretty weak retort but I give you half points forbthe attempt.

Is there anything productive you have to say now or so you feel the conversation has ran its course?