this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
165 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

72041 readers
2840 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Why are they... why are they having autocomplete recommend medical treatment? There are specialized AI algorithms that already exist for that purpose that do it far better (though still not well enough to even assist real doctors, much less replace them).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Are there any studies done (or benchmarks) that show accuracy on recommendations for treatments given a medical history and condition requiring treatment?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Im currently working on one now as a researcher. Its a crude tool to measure the quality of response. But its a start

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Gotta start somewhere, and it won’t ever improve if we don’t start improving it. So many on Lemmy assume the tech will never be good enough so why even bother, but that’s why we do things, to make the world that much better… eventually. Why else would we plant literal trees? For those that come after us.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

It's not an assumption it's just a matter of practical reality. If we're at best a decade off from that point why pretend it could suddenly unexpectedly improve to the point it's unrecognizable from its current state? LLMs are neat, scientists should keep working on them and if it weren't for all the nonsense "Ai" hype we have currently I'd expect to see them used rarely but quite successfully as it would be getting used off of merit, not hype.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago

Because sycophants keep saying it's going to take these jobs, eventually real scientists/researchers have to come in and show why the sycophants are wrong.