this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
58 points (100.0% liked)

science

19730 readers
1006 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: Changed to a non-plagerizing link

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

A hard truth is that if you see an executive pushing return to office, you know one of two things about them. One of the following is true.

  1. They are terrible at finance and don't understand the sunk-cost fallacy. They have to keep using that building they bought; they've spent so much on it and simply can't bring themselves to sell it.

  2. They're a sexual molester. They're someone that uses the power of their position to coerce sex out of their employees. Fucking their employees is their primary motivation for not retiring early right now. You can't coerce your secretary to give you a blowjob over Zoom.

That's really it. They're either bad at business or they're a sexual predator. If you see an executive pushing return to office, be sure to ask them which one of these they are. Because they're definitely one or the other.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)
  1. Tradition.
  2. Belief that work-from-home is less efficient.
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Those are both covered under 'bad at business'.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So

  1. They're morons and terrible at business.
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
  1. Remote didn't work as well for the company.
  2. Remote didn't work as well for any number of people at that company.
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We have work from home, i have gone to the office twice this year. But it is true it didn't work for everyone. Some left because of isolation factor, some fired because without anyone watching they just could not self motivate. In some case in-office meetings are way more productive, and you get those moments when a coworker overhears your convo and chimes in with something relevent that you would never have connection on in WFH

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

While there are a few that work better in an office, the overwhelming majority work better at home. Why should we force everyone to suffer for the handful of folks who can't self-motivate at home? We don't bend over backwards to cater to people who say, have auditory issues that make working in a crowded open-plan office debilitating. We tell those folks to go die in a fire if they can't handle an office environment. Plenty of people can't work in an office, but that was never been seen as an argument to get rid of offices.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Honestly I think your first point is just a subset of something larger and even more basic - "we've always done it this way. Change is scawwy. Different bad. Are you implying I was wrong before?" Etc.