rpg

3616 readers

1 users here now

This community is for meaningful discussions of tabletop/pen & paper RPGs

Rules (wip):

Do not distribute pirate content
Do not incite arguments/flamewars/gatekeeping.
Do not submit video game content unless the game is based on a tabletop RPG property and is newsworthy.
Image and video links MUST be TTRPG related and should be shared as self posts/text with context or discussion unless they fall under our specific case rules.
Do not submit posts looking for players, groups or games.
Do not advertise for livestreams
Limit Self-promotions. Active members may promote their own content once per week. Crowdfunding posts are limited to one announcement and one reminder across all users.
Comment respectfully. Refrain from personal attacks and discriminatory (racist, homophobic, transphobic, etc.) comments. Comments deemed abusive may be removed by moderators.
No Zak S content.
Off-Topic: Book trade, Boardgames, wargames, video games are generally off-topic.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Hasbro Seeks to Sell IP “DND” and Has Had Preliminary Contact with Tencent (pandaily.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

79 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Rumours, speculation and hearsay? "Interesting" at least.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

1: The CCP does not allow alternative parties

Correct, though it's the CPC. No one is arguing against that (aside from that other parties do exist and are allowed to hold lower offices), they are contesting what it means. Imagining that the DNC was a state organ rather than a private institution, what problem would be posed by there only being a DNC with no RNC or other significant competitor? What does the RNC actually accomplish in this situation?

Do you know what a primary election is?

This shit is why GenZedong had bots, people come in with nothing new to say but pithy one-liners as though their interlocutor even knowing what they are talking about isn't a refutation of it being an original statement.