this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

Atheism

4048 readers
2 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I won't look up actual facts I will just make stuff up to sound plausible in the thinnest margin and that's all I need to do. Because real life is just like court. Reasonable doubt is all we need!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

well some other comments pointed out that it's 2 years old so deepfake video is much less likely. But if this was from the last few weeks I'd say this goes beyond reasonable doubt. In politics there's always going to be people with motives to destroy a politician they think is harmful (which in this case he really is, of course). I think scrutiny is needed in any case. But if there's no evidence for fakery, I don't care about "reasonable doubt" either.

Forgive me for not looking for a video of a man sucking another man's dick, that's not my kink. I don't want to read articles describing the act either, with the risk of embedding a still. I don't even live in the same country as this so I couldn't care less if he actually did it, I just thought it was weird this wasn't mentioned in the preceding comments.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm not asking you to do anything that has anything to do with anything sexual. I am asking you to simply provide any sort of credible evidence towards your accusations of it being a deep fake. If you have knowledge of deep fakes you surely know where to find evidence to back up your claims. Or show me how you think it's something other than the rape victims say it is.

Like I'm all for proving that an innocent person is innocent. But at least have something besides just yelling random crap that it could be. "It's a fake video" with no evidence is not productive nor is it accurate. It's the blatant attempts from a party that does not understand what logical thinking means.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)
  1. I didn't declare or yell anything, I asked a question.
  2. What "rape victims" are you talking about? Seriously, what the actual fuck are you talking about? This post is about an anti-LGBT guy getting caught being gay. You're the one yelling baseless nonsense.
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You haven't even read the claims! Shut the fuck up.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

No, I made it very clear upfront: I read the OP and the comments I replied to. You're the one who went on the offensive and started a fight. You could have replied in a million other ways that aren't aggressive, or not replied at all.

Edit: and whatever claims you're talking about are not the topic of this conversaion

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Shut up. You are commenting on something you have no business commenting on. If you don't look something enough you aren't doing anything but spewing nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Again, you are the one talking about something that's not the subject of this post.

I'll grant your wish - this is the last time I reply to you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Again you are trying to police how you are taken. You are speaking about something you won't even read about. Shut up.