this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
174 points (92.6% liked)

World News

39004 readers
2660 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He was in hospital because shrapnel had severed his spine. In the west bank. You can throw semantics at it, but going by the context I'd put money on him not being actively engaged in combat as he was incapable by your words

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I think the best way to explain it is take the example to the extreme end - would bin laden have been capable of planning the 9/11 attacks from a hospital bed while not able to walk?

Law and precident are literally semantics - the difference between a war crime with the penalty of death and a frowny face is literally the details.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So then literally no one is protected then. According to you anyone could be a terrorist committing thought crime.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Feel like I'm talking with people trying to find a reason to be offended. Take 5 seconds

Is every protected person

  • a known member of a terrorist organization

  • been wounded conducting what are considered terrorist actions

  • in proximity to two other terrorists

  • before considering what other information may be held by IDF.