taxiiiii

joined 1 week ago
[–] taxiiiii@lemmy.world 1 points 59 minutes ago* (last edited 58 minutes ago)

Lol, go back to what exactly? I remember the overwhelming majority of parents had literally zero clue how to deal with the internet when it first became a thing. Children went online and saw all kinds of traumatizing shit.

I mean, at least people warned you to never post your name, age or pictures online.

The status quo sucks, but going back doesn't sound great either.

[–] taxiiiii@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Great answer, thank you.

[–] taxiiiii@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I don't, I'm within the group of privileged people who can pick and choose. I work part-time as of recently and feel alright about my job. I assume the same goes for you?

[–] taxiiiii@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago

Would make for a good Terry Pratchett novel.

[–] taxiiiii@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

If you have no dependents, no pre-existing debts to pay, are preferably young, live in a country with a good economy, got enough money or access to a decent social security program, then the internalized worldview might be the main problem.

Not saying this doesn't apply to quite a few people, but there are a lot of others who don't have that luxury.

[–] taxiiiii@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

social anxiety has entered the chat

[–] taxiiiii@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Let's say we decide that ~~morals~~ what is right and wrong is decided entirely by ourselves. Then it makes perfect sense to defend your own opinions and to disagree with people who disagree with your stance on right and wrong. You chose those morals after all. It's kinda part of the deal that they can't apply to you alone (example: when is it just to kill?)

So I don't see a contradiction.

I guess this post is about Inability to engage with a different set of morals. But assuming that their is an absolute truth for right and wrong wouldn't solve that issue, so I'm not sure why they brought it up.

[–] taxiiiii@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I don't disagree , but there's still the issue of different natural day-night rhythms. Night owls vs early birds.

Some people will need less discipline and motivation than others to achieve this.

Not to undermine the discipline of anyone who actually makes it happen.

[–] taxiiiii@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Care to take some of my hours, lol?

I need to sleep 10 hours, every night, otherwise I'm actively depriving myself of sleep. I'm not ill, got confirmed that that's just how it is. A 40 hour work week really wasn't made for this.

[–] taxiiiii@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If someone gets abducted and put in a stolen house with stolen furniture, are they to blame?

Like, I get it, we enjoy the privileges and share the responsibility to change shit. But responsibility and blame are two different things.

[–] taxiiiii@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The original commenter said that burning down Teslas might destroy the owners life. This is a car that costs somewhere between 40000 (?) and 150000 dollars. Someone who can afford that is highly likely to recover. That's what this commenter pointed out.

Stating that isn't saying that it's cool to burn down a random person's car.

[–] taxiiiii@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I do that in reverse, lol. Except I'm also not a native speaker. "Rephrase this, it should sound more scientific".

view more: next ›