patatas

joined 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 39 minutes ago* (last edited 38 minutes ago) (2 children)

Ah, I see, you're OK with it because you like the policy.

My original post didn't say it was concerning though, so I'm not sure why you responded as though it did.

Edit: also, you seem to be following me around different Lemmy communities with a 3-hour-old account. Any reason for that?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 51 minutes ago* (last edited 40 minutes ago)

I find it interesting you are so fixated on the pancake aspect when the piece is (to me at least) quite clearly about the PM's personality, and how it parallels his policy and actions.

Thanks for pointing out the broken link, I'll correct that

Edit: that link seems to be working again, but it did take a while to load, weird

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (4 children)

It doesn't worry you that the PM is pandering to that right-leaning audience, rather than standing up for things like climate action?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Curious if you clicked any of the dozen links that back up the claims made in the piece?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Thanks for reading!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Oh, lol, I'll take some blame there too, I maybe should have hyphenated 'right-wing'

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Worth asking what exactly they're collaborating on then, right? Just a couple days ago, ministers from those same two provinces asked the Feds not to renew the requirements to provide safe drinking water to Indigenous communities. And the screenshot here was careful to include the word 'pipelines'.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

How would you frame the PM's post, out of curiosity?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

Tbh I'm starting to think Carney is worse, if only because so many Liberal supporters are unwilling to criticize his actions, despite how much they align with Conservatives' goals.

If Poilievre was the one ramming through things like Bill C-5, these same folks would be livid!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

If you do end up reading it, I'd love to hear what you think :)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Fair point. Here's the text that Carney wrote:

"The premiers are right on: Canada has what the world needs, and we need to get back into the business of exporting it to new markets. We’re building one united Canadian economy, and there’s more to come."

Here's the headline from the screenshot:

"Premiers Danielle Smith and Doug Ford agree to study new energy corridors, more trade."

And this is the text in the screenshot, below the picture of Premiers Smith and Ford at a press conference (the screenshot is from CTV news, btw):

"The premiers of Alberta and Ontario agreed Monday to a feasibility study of new pipelines and rail lines between provinces and pledged to increase interprovincial trade of"

(Screenshot cuts off at this point)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago

lol yeah sorry was looking through someone else's comment history (someone who seems quite hostile to criticism of dear leader) and found your post also getting a big pile-on from Canada's Insufferable Liberal Hordes

and yeah it ain't great

 

The Wonder Valley website is making emissions-related claims that O'Leary Ventures' CEO has openly admitted are false. Are they running afoul of Canada's greenwashing legislation?

view more: next ›