infeeeee

People are different, different people like different things, and they care about different features of a device.

I never had any apple device, but I help a lot other people with iphones and macs, and I have to tell you they are just devices. I'm familiar with their features, but I don't care, this whole thing is only about you. If you want an iphone buy one. If you don't want one, just move on, life is too short for getting mad about unnecessary thing like this.

Mentions of Lemmy communities only work in top toots on Mastodon. Otherwise Mastodon users could spam Lemmy unintentionally very easily. You can also mention only one community in a top toot, so you can't post the same toot to multiple communities.

Afaik Mastodon devs are working on a group implementation, so this will improve in the future.

Because no one should rely on that, they recommend to fully automate renewal with a script or some other programs.

Wouldn't it be better to replace the full rom at this point? You trust other parts but not the dialer?

What I'm trying to say, if you think your built in dialer is a spyware, it's very likely other components of the rom could be spyware as well, and you don't gain too much by replacing only this component.

Wdym spyware? Isn't the stock dialer comes from aosp and it's open source? Or your rom doesn't use that one?

Here is a section of a map from 1823, it shows the buildings built on top of that, note the circular shape:

Same map browsable here, change the opacity on the top right to see current aerial photo.

According to some legends it was used as a fort in the middle ages, bu afaik no archeological remains support this.

Another map from 1878, with more details, it shows the contours of the buildings:

Source

Mohammed Ben Sulayem, president of FIA. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammed_Ben_Sulayem

Actually we have a tag for old names like this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:old_name

But if it only existed for such a short time I'm not sure if it's significant enough to map it after it was closed. If it would have been already mapped while it was open it would make sense, but if no one ever cared about this before?

You can add a note if you think it's important enough, local mappers will have to decide.

I don't know how the osmand snapshot were wrong, though I never used this manual offline download feature.

As I see you haven't created notes for these problems yet, I created them for you. You can see them here:

• https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4743334
• https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4743340
• https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4743344
• https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4743351

I updated Bierfabriek Amsterdam from your description, in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165840808

Flower Burger was already updated in March to the croissant shop, so you used outdated map data in your app, osm was already fixed months ago. See the history of the node here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1348523661/history

I didn't updated Brouwerij De Engel, as on osm we map only what is currently there. You can check the history of already mapped objects, but mapping what was there is not the scope of the project. If the old name is still visible on the building than it can be mapped, if the signs are already removed, it has no place on osm: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_historic_events_and_historic_features

Arson usually has some human remains, who were inside the houses, but it's not the case here, there are burned bones from earlier and latter cultures, but not from here (if I understand this correctly):

For example early Neolithic houses have more artifacts deposited in them, and it is in these early Neolithic phases that burned human remains are most likely to occur (Chapman 1999). Human remains occur again in the late Eneolithic (Gumelniţa/Karanovo VI). The presence or absence of human remains in the rubble of burned houses is clearly of great significance.

Wikipedia has a very detailed article on them: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cucuteni%E2%80%93Trypillia_culture

One of the most notable aspects of this culture was the periodic destruction of settlements, with each single-habitation site having a lifetime of roughly 60 to 80 years. The purpose of burning these settlements is a subject of debate among scholars; some of the settlements were reconstructed several times on top of earlier habitational levels, preserving the shape and the orientation of the older buildings. One location, the Poduri site in Romania, revealed thirteen habitation levels that were constructed on top of each other over many years.