deadlyduplicate

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Look up crisis theory, the rate of profit tends to fall in capitalist systems. Because each company is driven by competitive self-interest, it is incapable of acting for the good of the whole. You simply cannot devote resources to anything but trying to out-compete your rivals and in doing so the profit for everyone tends lower and lower until you have a crisis.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

I'm curious

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't believe that is accurate. Beside moons (which don't orbit the sun), Pluto is the largest and closest dwarf planet.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

If those are the only options, I am choosing juggalo

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Chatgpt... please summarize the Gartner hype cycle for a 5 year old

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

When you have commodity money, the value of the money is derived from the value of the commodity. You don't get to assign arbitrarily higher values to the money because the market determines the value. But yes, all speculative assets typically have a higher extrinsic value compared with their intrinsic value but I don't believe that has anything to do with it being a medium of exchange or not. That is just supply and demand.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Gold is a commodity and you can create a currency that is backed by a commodity so you aren't actually trading the commodity itself.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (7 children)

That is not true, for the vast majority of the history of money it was based on a commodity that was valuable in its own sense. It is only in the last century that we have begun experimenting with currencies that are not pegged to the value of a commodity.

Cryptocurrencies derived their value from being a network of users (metcalfe's law) so they are more like a commodity money. Thing about something like Meta, which has a valuation in the trillions despite its physical assets not be worth nearly that and its functionality as a website being easily replicated on an alternative platform. The users are what is valuable.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

It's called accelerationism and it is stupid

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Sure, but a lot of people have also 'heard' that mbti is not scientifically valid and go around parroting that without any knowledge of what specifically science says about it.

It is entirely possible that outside of a scientific discipline, mbti works well enough for people to use.

Kind of like how we use the term "meme" and understand what it means but the concept of memes are not used in science because other models of cultural evolution have better explanatory power.

 

When I first joined Reddit I really enjoyed the conversations I had with other people. I don't really care about internet points and I always just sought out people whose opinions are different than my own to get diverse perspectives. In this way, subreddits centered around a particular point of view would guarantee me a conversation that was engaging and perhaps an opportunity to learn something.

But lately I noticed that moderators on that site have been using their bans to simply silence dissenting opinions and control the narrative and looking through moderator code of conduct it seems that the practice is not discouraged at all.

The first ban I ever received on that site was just a few months ago when I wrote just two sentences in response to someone. My post was not offensive in any way and I was writing in good faith. This was also the first time I ever posted on that subreddit. The moderator who permanently banned me claimed I was just to stupid to be allowed to continue posting in their community.

I am certainly capable of profound stupidity but just not the type one could devise in just a few sentences so I suspect that moderator was not being genuine with me.

Since then I have received two more permanent bans for posts which again were made in good faith and not racist, sexist, or displaying any obvious reason to take such a drastic action. Never a warning that I was violating the rules or a even a temporary ban. When I ask the moderator why, I get "muted". A permanent ban should be for obvious trolling, spammers or people who repeatedly violate the subreddit rules. Not for just expressing a different opinion.

I feel like a certain breed of moderator has hijacked most of the subreddits I would have once found interesting to participate in. They come with a mandate to advance a specific agenda and it seems like Reddit's fate has to become just like every other social media website that groups people by their beliefs while re-enforcing and radicalizing them.

Oh and the first moderator that banned me, he is active on the fediverse as well and they have re-created their community on kbin. So I suspect these types of people will eventually control the communities here as well.

 

view more: next ›