I couldn't care less what happens to the wine industry, but are people really using weed as an alternative? They're completely different experiences. I enjoy drinking, but cannabis is in no way pleasurable to me at all.
corroded
I have a few issues with what you're saying. By getting a drivers license and operating a vehicle on public roadways, you're agreeing that you'll keep your vehicle in whatever operational condition the law dictates. A "fix-it" ticket is justified if your car doesn't meet these requirements. Officers applying this law unfairly is a whole other issue, but the concept is not "onerous and stupid."
Also, police need some level of "officer discretion." If you have a friend with a gaping wound in your passenger seat and you're doing 90mph to the hospital, do you really want a cop to write you a ticket and force you to wait for paramedics to arrive while your friend bleeds out?
I've never understood this. Even if they are absolutely convinced that they're right, you can go watch 1000 videos of judges and cops who are wholly unimpressed with their gibberish. They might be convinced they know a hidden truth, but what good is it when the established institutions don't recognize it as truth?
My theory is that they're just lacking in reasoning skills. How else would you become a sovcit in the first place? If their arguments were effective, every lawyer in the country would be using them.
I truly believe that these license plates actually work but not for the reason these idiots think.
As soon as a cop sees your plate, they instantly know you're driving an unregistered vehicle, probably dont have a license, insane, looking for an argument, and impervious to reason. Good chance they're going to say "Fuck it, I'm not dealing with this crap today."
Children can have phones, tablets, etc when they are old enough to purchase them with their own income.
Before that, a desktop with parental control software is more than enough for schoolwork.
This is very situational. I'm not a contractor, but I spend a significant portion of my time doing hobbies that require power tools. I don't need a drill that will last for an entire day at a jobsite. Ryobi works fine for me. On the other hand, I wish I had never spent $600 on a cheap planer; I knew I'd want a better one eventually,, and sure enough, I found a need to upgrade after a few years. Now I've spent $3600 on planers. I could have just gone with the $3k one and saved myself $600.
If I'm going to use it once, I borrow it. If I'm going to use it every few months, I buy a cheap one. If I'm going to use it every week, then it's worth it to me to buy something I can keep for at least a decade or two.
I agree with you to a certain point.
When somebody finishes high-school and becomes an adult, they should develop a useful skill that they can turn into a career. This might be going to college for STEM, it might be a trade-school, or it might be an apprenticeship as a skilled tradesman. I wouldn't discount all liberal arts degrees either; a degree in graphic design can be well worth the time.
The important thing is that people entering the workforce can say "I'm a doctor," "I'm a plumber," "I'm an auto mechanic," "I'm a software developer," etc. Be able to say "I do something."
Going to college for an undergraduate degree in art history? That's something you should do after you're already established in your career and you feel like you'd like to learn something more. Going to school to learn to be a chef, paint cars, build furniture, etc, they might not be STEM or law degrees, but they're useful.
I guess in summary, kids should go to school to learn a useful skill. Adults should go to school for whatever they want.
It really depends on how far back you want to look.
If the US was to suddenly stop projecting its interests internationally, then as others have mentioned, then likely the world work become somewhat more socialized. European countries would probably step up and try to keep China in check, but without the US contributing to these efforts, it would cause a significant strain on their military resources.
If the US was to take an isolationist policy 100 years ago, then there is a good chance that WW2 would have been won by the Axis. The Allied forces likely would have put up a good fight, but I'm not sure they would have emerged victorious against the combined Axis forces. The war in the Pacific would have raged on much longer, and without nuclear weapons, there would have been an extreme loss of life invading Japan. At the very least, WW2 would have lasted much much longer than it did. Depending on the outcome, plenty of countries might currently be speaking German and debating if they should tear down 80-year-old statues of Hitler.
A lot of boomers are really particular about well-manicured yards, pristine gardens, etc. Squirrels do not help with this.
I love seeing little divots where our squirrels bury nuts. If they eat some of our plants, then I put a cage around it or plant new ones. Seeing the little guys play and eat the food we put out for them far outweighs any minor landscaping problems they cause.
I thought I spelled something wrong; I didn't, and now I'm lost. Aren't most non-fiber connections asymmetrical connections?
The problem isn't that Harris is being held to a higher standard. The problem is that Americans think of elections the same way they think of a sporting match. It's "my team is going to win!" not "I'm going to vote for the candidate that is best aligned with my beliefs." A huge number of the people who are voting Republican are doing so because the Republican party is their "team," and damn it, their team is going to win even if it kills them.
Many years ago, I was discussing politics with a coworker (always a bad idea, but whatever). It went something like this:
"So, you don't think the less-fortunate should be able to afford medical care?" "No, of course not, everyone should be able to see a doctor."
"You don't think gay people should be allowed to marry?" "I'm not gay, but they can do whatever makes them happy."
"You support the war in Iraq, then?" "I support our troops, but the war is kind of a waste."
"We definitely should legalize weed, right?" "Um, I'd smoke it if I didn't get drug tested."
"So why are you voting Republican, then?" "My family is Republican; we always do."
That's kind of the point I was trying to make. They feel so different, I can't imagine one being a viable alternative to the other.