Forks do not exist in git. It's a GitHub feature, and a massive blunder at the same time.
best_username_ever
Try gimp.org.
Yeah. They only read textbooks to quiet kids, they do not have unpaid overtime at home for grading tests, and earn a million dollars every month. Lazy bastards.
It’s fake nostalgia of an era they never experienced. Vinyls always sounded like shit but we had no comparison except the better sound of movie theaters, but you couldn’t have that at home.
Then the audio CD appeared and it was like the second coming of Jesus. The sound was really a hundred times better than vinyls, even with the same set of amps and speakers.
One day they’ll tell us that VHS on a small black and white TV is better than a 4K movie on a giant screen.
Is there a downside? I’m confused.
I don’t understand the downvotes. You’re right on all points. If the task is too big, it can take years from testing another solution to using it for real.
I’m bored too, but not bored enough to post shitty shit like this.
On veut des photos avant et après, même floutées.
Do you do it yourself with a European recipe? You would get the same result I guess.
Back when Nginx started, Apache was the only alternative and a big pain in the ass. That’s how it became popular.
That’s boring. Altman wants to save the world whatever that means, not solve the shitty problems that poor people have.
How can such a wrong answer get so many points? Clones and forge forks are unrelated. First, GitHub or GitLab cannot and could not link clones together without analyzing the remotes of each clone.
FFS it's a tech community...