Welt

Not true, .org was supposed to be for non-profit organisations, with .gov and .com for other government and commercial entities.

Seconded

I'd understand it as two mismatched socks.

True. Otherwise we'd have no use for that stupid word 'throuple'. We should call them fews.

Oh, this sparked my hill to die on - two (2). Why the fuck do you need to put it into Hindu-Arabic numeral form (parenthetically, and condescendingly) when you've already given the word in text, which is otherwise in English and it can be assumed that most English-speakers know the word two?!

Funny that knikkers are marbles! Probably used to be the same in English with een paar, but with language change moving English away from its West Germanic roots we tend not to use 'pair' so often any more except when referring to specific things where it's important that there's two of them, like aces or... knickers.

Here's one I can weigh in on. I realise they have different meanings now, but they didn't always. As language evolves, often words that used to be synonyms are differentiated so that their meanings, while still similar, have a different nuance. An example off the top of my head: sin and crime. Sin was the Old English word for crime, before the Romance word 'crime' entered English, presumably after William the Conqueror invaded and French became the language of court. 'Sin' didn't disappear, it just became a more specialised form of the now general word 'crime' - meaning a crime against God, used to describe moral failings rather than acts hurting others like theft or murder. We still have both words today, and both are useful, even though they originally meant the same. Since the distinction between 'envy' and 'jealousy' is arguably pretty nuanced, I suspect the same thing happened here - both were comparative and related to the difference between what you have and what your neighbour has, I think the differentiation is relatively recent. I'm not sure if this explanation helps you resolve this hill to die on, please let me know if I can elaborate further.

Less be da villan

wtf?

It's a pretty terrible feature then. Feature is a weird word

And you lack the self-awareness to understand why so many think "vegan bad". You're a naive and petulant child.

If you travel by land or from the US and don't need a visa/visa waiver, you can. I can't understand how that draconian law could be enforced if the Canadian Government wasn't able to do a background check.