Toda

Hare is interesting.

We have a community for it on this instance, here. But it's currently dead and unmoderated.

That actually fills me with joy to read.

It certainly did. It certainly got me playing again!

I prefer Chess, but they're both fantastic. The last couple of years, it really feels like Chess has shot back into the mainstream - and it's exciting!

Thanks, I'll keep all that in mind. It's something I'm hoping to get out of the Fediverse too. I just need to push myself to be more active, rather than just passively consuming.

How have you gone about making friends on the platform? I checked it out, but found it a bit isolating. Surely that's on me rather than the platform, so I'd like to hear of your experience.

I don't disagree, I do think there are too many communities for the number of active users (both here, and Lemmy in general). What I'd be interested to know is this: Is there some research into the subject, or even a write-up from someone who has successfully grown a thriving community in the past?

I'd argue that with [email protected] being the "default" community, this is somewhat mitigated. It's not policed, so you can post there about Rust, Godot, Python, or whatever you like and nobody will moderate you or ask you to move along. Maybe the "over-dilution", as you call it, hurts the instance as a whole. But if you think of Lemmy as something wider than a single instance, it matters less. [email protected] is the flagship instance here, and it's a large one by Lemmy standards. People will subscribe to that from all over the Fediverse.

So I think it comes down to your view of programming.dev as an instance vs Lemmy as a network of federated communities. Ultimately, people will just subscribe to whatever instances interest them - and hopefully Lemmy as a whole will thrive, including this instance.

I actually think the privatized model works well for telecommunications companies, but only with strict and heavy regulation. For the same reason as it works with supermarkets, it forces the networks to compete and ultimately keep prices down. But that regulation needs to prevent the large players from merging and buying up competition.

Masts and other infrastructure should be nationalized though, and any networks wishing to use the infrastructure would then have to contribute to funding it. Similar to openreach, but properly nationalized and truly neutral.

The sweetness if fine, offset by lashings of salt and butter (or butter alternative).

I just have to stop for a moment when I realise I'm covering a pan of oats with... the liquid from what would have been another pan of oats at some point. Oatception.

PS: Thanks!

I hate to be a bore, and regurgitate the same "leftie" discourse that gets repeated a lot online, but:

Royal Mail would become “financially and operationally unsustainable in the long term”

This is because Royal Mail has become private and is now required to become profitable / increase it's value over time. Which is nonsense. It should be a public service funded by a mix of direct payment (e.g. stamps) and taxation.

If continuing to run six days per week, as the are currently obliged to, has become unsustainable then perhaps it is time it returns to public ownership.

Oat milk, by far. I find it tastes the best of them all in coffee and tea, and works well in things like mashed potatoes too. I do also put it in porridge, but that feels... Uncomfortable.

Yes, no long commuting has slashed my podcast listening time too. I now only listen to them on the school run (if my son wants to listen too), or during chores.