So, a moment of curiosity.
If my theoretical pistol did get pulled into am MRI machine, stuck against it by the magnet, and I, for the purpose of scientific inquiry, pulled the trigger, should I expect the bullet to fire more or less as normal, to fire, but the bullet be pulled back to the machine, or for the bullet to not move, or not move more than an inch or so from the barrel?
Ah, I see. You are thinking about the properly structured flowchart, not the humorously true one.
Yea, fair enough.
chasing the dragon
Huh. I guess it might be.
Far from my first game, but my first perfect game. Yea, I guess that does track.
Not a sequel. Just because it's not Portal 1. The fact that it's second is not the problem. The problem is that the first one was flawless.
Portal 1 was flawless. Portal 2 had a crucial flaw.
Specifically, it was not Portal 1. Everything else was perfect.
I don't see that as a problem. I can easily get caught in that loop.
They should shut it down anyway. If Trump can ignore the court, we can ignore Trump
Other than that, it seems fairly accurate.
I don't believe so.
I could be wrong.
It wasn't an American who wrote "Foot Heads Arms Body."
Because "spied for," and "spied with" are both options.
"I spied them" is a legitimate sentence, but it doesn't mean covert surveillance in that sentence, only to have seen then, generally through some difficulty.
Interesting.
Not the answer I'm looking for, but still interesting. Thanks for the information!