NorthWestWind
The problem is the ambiguity of the statement. Is it 50% of each species? Or is it 50% of all life as one set?
If it's the former case, then sure 3.5b humans and n/2 bacteria gets snapped.
But if it's the latter case, we group all 7b and n bacteria into one set and snap half of them. This 50% can consist of 50% humans + 50% bacteria, but there's also a chance for it to include 0% humans + 100% bacteria. Therefore, the amount of humans snap is a random variable instead of a constant.
A squid fried this rice
Yeah maybe posting it here doesn't really help?
Say, there exists 2 humans and 98 bacteria. Consider all cells of a human one life.
50% of ALL life doesn't care which species the life is, and therefore there's a chance that 50 bacteria die. The probability of that happening is 98C50 / 100C50 = 98! 50! 50! / (100! 50! 48!) = (50)(49) / ((100)(99)) = 0.247
For my previous argument, I did not actually do the math. Now that I have done a little bit, the probability seems to converge at 25%
Obviously, this is based on the interpretation of "all life". For my interpretation, "all life" includes every life in a single set, and apply the 50% snap to that. For some others however, it may be interpreted as each species in their own set, and the 50% snap is applied on each set individually.
If you include bacteria, then probably no human died from the snap. There are significantly more of them
some wish computer science was that simple
This is Mandarin. 屌 (diao3) is the character that means "fucking (adj)" here. It is a swear in most of China, except Taiwan, where it typically means "good (adj)".
In Cantonese, we instead use the character 撚 (pronounced like "lung" with an upward tone)
🍆💦 watering the plants
What kind of sicko try to find their repos from the recent list on the main page??
SO has been taking a longer time to load for me. Does anyone have the same problem?
EndeavourOS. It's just easy to install and I basically use it like Arch