HakunaHafada

joined 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 hours ago

I hate everything about this title.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago

Go for it. In the world of IT, people networking, experience, and certs are more useful than a degree. Degrees might get you past the HR screening, but the others get you the job.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

10/10, would use an online translator again.

Edit: And now I see it's already translated in the description. Silly me.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 16 hours ago

I'm sure the owner's laptop has Windows on it, too.

I'll see myself out....

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

TOS, The Empath. I fuckin' loathe that episode.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

This one is my favorite.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's been incredibly informative. The author starts off by stating plenty of other books talk about the "LGB" letters (sexual orientation), but she's focusing on the "TQI" letters (internal identity of self). Additionally, the most important thing in reading/studying/applying Biblical scriptures is understanding the context of them.

Some super-condensed highlights of the book:

  • Discussion of exclusion (of outsiders, specifically non-Hebrew, women, eunuchs, etc.) in the Old Testament for the purpose of protecting the identity and purity of patriarchal Hebraic society vs. the radically-different inclusion brought about through Jesus in the New Testament.
  • The application of Deuteronomy 22:5 against cross-dressing (A woman must not wear men’s clothing, nor a man wear women’s clothing...) is based on a mis-translation of the original text. The original word for "clothing" is keli; other appearances of this word include vessel, receptacle, armor, tool. The word for "man" is geber, or warrior. Thus, a better understanding of the text is "women should not wear a man's armor". Another interpretation is not to cross-dress for the purpose of pagan worship, which was popular amongst other religions at the time.
  • "God created them male and female" in Genesis is not an argument that only male and female identities exist and anything else is against his plan.
  • The author questions why some medical body changes are culturally-accepted (Botox, breast augmentation/reduction, teeth whitening, hair dye, etc.), but HRT for trans* individuals is unacceptable for some people.
  • Gender-variant individuals in the Bible: Jacob (who appeared very feminine compared to his "manly" brother Esau); Joseph of the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat fame (the original words for the "ornate robe" that he wore were ketonet passim, and the only other usage of those words appear in Tamar's story, where she wore "the kind of garment the virgin daughters of the king" wore. Thus: Joseph the flamboyant cross-dresser); Deborah, the judge and prophet (but women at that time were property, so she was doing some serious gender-defying; other eunuchs that play a major role in their stories.
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'm halfway through Bible and the Transgender Experience, by Linda Herzer.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Neat! The flag/core count part, not the transphobia part. Transphobia will never be cool.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Sometimes you gotta have a surprise DR test. Theory is great, but praxis matters.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The greatest country in the world!

spoilerallegedly

195
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Happy Pride month, folks.

 

Do other countries/areas of the world have entire months dedicated to some specific thing, such as Pride month, AAPI month, Black History month, etc. Part of me thinks this is a U.S.-specific phenomenon, but I'm curious about the rest of the world.

view more: next ›