overview for Foofighter

The Holotypic Occlupanid Research Group in c/[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago

Someone noticed. My urge to get in touch with them to propose a change is gone for some reason.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

TAKE MY MONEY!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (5 children)

But that's kind of my point. I don't understand/know where the simplicity comes in. My experience from Fedora and Ubuntu is: Install is straightforward and almost identical between both distros Login Done

To me, mint is a bloated Ubuntu (no offense for those who appreciate it)

1

Fedora (discuss.tchncs.de)

submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

16 comments fedilink

Hello fellow linuxers

I am kinda confused as to why certain Linux distros are mentioned in in every others post while others seems to get litten attention or are being bashed at worst. People advertise for Mint because it's so easy to use, while I personally miss it's benefits over Ubuntu.

Personally I used KDE Neo for some time and switched to Fedora 42 a few weeks ago. It has all the same tools as basically every other distros. What is missed is not necessary or available. I can also seamlessly manage my proxmox server through ssh and fish and take up minor programming tasks on python or arduino.

Am I missing something important, or just seeing a loud minority with very specific requir?

Let's do this in c/[email protected]