Daryl

And exactly what did we do with the First Nations lands in Southern Ontario?

There is absolutely no doubt that the environment would be collateral damage. It always has, always will be. The trade-off will never go away. But the Rideau Canal system was done in an environmentally friendly manner, and so too could this venture.

One does not really have to go any further than the Roman Catholic (Empire) Church to see the proliferation of fascism in action, and also to see the tremendous effort to re-define fascism so that it does NOT apply to what the Empire has done in the past, and in fact many facets in it are still doing. Although the last Pope seemed to be trying to get the Empire away from operating in that mode, and we will see what the new Pope does.

My personal take is that the spread of fascism is being prompted by a particularly well organized institution that is co-coordinating a lot of the events that are feeding the fascist goals, and it is managing to stay below the radar simply because the news media refuses to call it for what it is. But the events are too well orchestrated, too well co-ordinated, too well funded, and too contiguous not to be planned by some central authority.

The rise of fascism has nothing to do with our ignorance of history, but with the success of the fascists in convincing the general public that what they are doing is not fascism. Those who control the label, control the information flow.

Yeah, then they would be forced to take public transportation.

So you think that the loss of huge tracts of trees has nothing to do with the decline of lumbering in Canada? The facts and the evidence indicate differently. Politicaldogma, on the other hand, has no respect for facts or the truth.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/british-columbia-forestry-future-pine-beetle-1.6712576

Agriculture is relevant only as far as you proclaim to to be. The discussion is neither about agriculture nor agricultural productivity. Yield per acre is now a much better indicator of agricultural success than farm labor productivity.

I have absolutely no idea where you got the notion that I thought Canada's educational system is inferior to that of America. That notion is just silly. What I am saying is that the government is not putting enough public money into our highly successful and highly effective apprenticeship programs. A program is only as influential to our economy as the number of students who can get into it.

Digging deeper, something is amiss with the reference the article sites.

https://nam.org/mfgdata/facts-about-manufacturing-expanded/

According to this cited article, Item 4 there are 13 million American manufacturing jobs.

Buried well down, item 15, foreign-owned firms employed 5.3 million workers in America in the manufacturing sector.

The way I was taught math, that represents around 40% of the American manufacturing jobs are in non-American-owned companies. Yet the article identifies this (minimizing the impact) as only 16.4%. Are Americans really this bad at math? Or this good at obfuscation? But 40% is really signifying 'branch plant economy', similar to Canada..

What has devastated the Canadian lumber industry are the forest fires and the Pine Bark Beetle.

The irony of this is that China is now doing this to the US - America is rapidly becoming a 'spoke' in the wheel of the Chinese 'hub'. For example, General Electric Appliance Division is now owned by a Chinese company Haier, and all GE Appliances built in America are now Chinese models, all profits going back to China. So even if America buys 'made-in-America', China still gets richer.

The value of the Canadian dollar is dependent on the CPI only to the extent that the market relies on the CPI to assess what the market is willing to pay for the dollar. Interest rates probably have a greater influence. The BoC can influence the exchange rate of the dollar to a limited extent by influencing supply/demand through the purchase/sale of Canadian debt instruments, but that is indirect through interest rates. China can influence the price of the Canadian dollar by either selling off or buying Canadian dollars in its foreign currency reserves.

In point of fact, China COULD theoretically tan the American dollar by selling off the trillion it has in American currency reserves, but that would be a one-shot weapon and it would also cause pain in China, since China now owns so much of American industry.

It depends on exactly what you mean by 'bricked'. Take over the operation of the car, or just cause it to stop functioning? Teslas are easy to disable remotely. Just botch up the navigation system. But to cause them to deliberately crash? Takeover the complete control of the car?

Not completely. Even given China's enormous manufacturing capacity, there are still gaps in it. China very definitely prioritizes the manufacturing, even after the opening up of the economy to private entrepreneurs. For instance, it has delegated cities of well over a million people each to a dedicated task - one to robotics and the other to quantum computing. Everything in the city - infrastructure, education, facilities, governance - is directed towards these focus centers of excellence.

If it is not high on the government priority list, it is fair game to outside countries to fill the gap. America just does not want to manufacture what China wants. If Canada decides to do so,the opportunities are there.