this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
20 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9700 readers
662 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is an idea that needs to be revisited. A shorter marine route from the prairies to export markets.

It would open up the West to greater trade with Europe.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The outlets of the French river on Georgian Bay are full of wonderful places to visit if you ever get the chance. Try splashing around in the water there and imagine a giant port with ocean-going freighters.

The linked article provides no support for the insane idea of "revisiting" this interesting but now-obsolete plan. It mentions that the St. Lawrence Seaway was built instead.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

That is the problem with Canadians - we dismiss clear visionary projects too soon, just because there is 'something else' that vested interests want to protect their investment in. The Americans wanted the Seaway, and they did NOT want the Northern route because they would have no control over it. The Avro again and again and again. Canada does only what the Americans can control. I don't see anyone complaining that the super-port for ocean-going freighters at Thunder Bay spoiled the North. Still as picturesque as ever.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And Algonquin Park would never have existed, and or been completely developed over.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

And exactly what did we do with the First Nations lands in Southern Ontario?

There is absolutely no doubt that the environment would be collateral damage. It always has, always will be. The trade-off will never go away. But the Rideau Canal system was done in an environmentally friendly manner, and so too could this venture.