It's extremely hard to give a machine a sense of morality without having to manually implement it on every node that constitutes their network. Current LLMs aren't even aware of what they're printing out, let alone understand the moral implications from that.
The day a machine is truly aware of the morality of what they say, in addition to actually understanding it, then we truly have AI. Currently, we have gargantuan statistical models that people glorify into nigh-godhood.
Sign my petition, damn it!
The LOTR movie was full of absolute legends, from sir Ian suggesting lore accurate shots, to Christopher Lee showing Peter Jackson how people truly die when stabbed in the lungs.
Make it six Astronomical Units. Yeet them into the Sun.
However, do keep in mind that LLMs regularly pull language an library features out of their asses that have no direct correspondent in practice. I'd use the LLMs to generate small snippets of code, giving them a small and restricted set of requirements to minimize hallucinations.
I have to use W11, but I use ExplorerPatcher to make it bearable.
The Pope would probably know how to code in HolyC.
It is worse when you're an anarchist. Best case, they say you're a socialist. Worst case, they say you're an extremist rioter.
Both are not true, but the later couldn't be further from it.
Don't underestimate the legacy code. There's a reason we avoid it.
If it involves pointers, not unlikely.
In order to delete an element or replace it based on a list, you definitely need JS. You have no other way to access the DOM.
A good chunk of the atoms in our bodies are carbon, yet we don't see plastic being naturally created on our bodies, now do we?