CarlsIII

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

It’s not even a pronoun in this context, it’s just a noun.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Sent to the principals office for being a nerd

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Only 3 ghosts? They just keep making Pac man easier, huh?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wow, maybe the taliban really will be defeated by capitalism

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

If you haven’t even seen the show, why are you defending the characterization? If you had seen the show, you would know Eddie Munson is not socially awkward, especially compared to most of the other main characters who actually are portrayed that way.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Eddie from stranger things is neurodivergent?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Seeing Texas and Florida on there tells me there must be very good reasons for it to be illegal.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Is there a third thing besides extroverts and introverts? Because I hate being around people and I also hate being alone.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok, fine; you got me. I am now convinced. Nobody should ever say what they mean, and everyone should always assume everyone intends to say something completely different than what they actually said, in every situation. Also, sarcasm should be illegal. But even still, I didn’t need to hear your comment about how you are sexually attracted to animals. That seemed really out of place.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Well then, thank God you’re here to tell me what my own words mean.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

This is not, in fact. “reading into phrases past their actual meanings” and is, in fact, called “assuming someone is lying”.

You just did it again!!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (7 children)

What I said is still a part of what you proposed, just not specifically.

Absolutely not. What you said had nothing to do with anything I said. I did not say we should “believe everything everyone says.” That’s not even a part of what I said.

You then proceeded to:

read into phrases past their actual meanings

The alternative to “reading into phrases past their actual meanings” is not to “believe everything everyone says.” It’s simply not assuming someone intended to say something completely different than what they actually said, which is what you did.

And the alternative to “expecting others to infer what you think based on subjective social rules” is to just say what you mean in the first place.

See the conflict we’re having right now? We could have avoided this if you simply didn’t read into what I said past the actual meaning.

view more: next ›