BlueMagma

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

My answer:

I only see a single white rectangular shape with holes, I don't think this particular shape describe in any way my personality or work ethic. 3 paragraphs seems way too much to talk about a white shape.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We used to have self driving vehicles running on water and hay.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Always heard it pronouced "cute", how would you pronounce it ?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Aren't we doing that with books and magazine already ? Also many stores have TV on which they project movies that they sell dvd for

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But then If we agree on IP, we should not complain that openai want free access to copyrighted materials, we should use their own logic to force them to make their model open source, and free for anyone to execute on their own hardware.

They get free access to data so we should get free access to the compilation of the data. Then they can charge us for the hardware cost of running the model, but they'll have to charge us no more than what it costs, because they will be competing with other company running the exact same model and driving the price down.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't know about you, but that's my endgame, I want the end of Intellectual property, which in my opinion is the dumbest idea and the biggest scam of capitalism.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To answer your first question: No I don't think the person growing turnip that I can see from the street should be compensated for the photograph I sell of that turnip. What next ? should we also compensate his parents for teaching him how to grow turnip, or his grandparent for teaching his parents ? What about the architect who designed the house next door that you can see in the background of the photograph ? Should the maker of the camera be compensated every time I take a picture ?....

Anyway back to AI:

I think though that the AI model resulting from freely accessing all images should also be fully open source and that anyone should be allowed to locally execute it on their own hardware. Let's use this to push for the end of Intellectual property.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But these are intellectual property, would you be ok having to pay to be allowed to remember what you saw in the shop ?

Currently If I go to the shop, see a tasty looking ready meal, I can look at what ingredients are in it, go home and try to cook something similar without having to pay for the recipe.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That's not exactly true. They are selling tools for people to recreate with variation.

I propose an analogy: Let's imagine a company sells brush that are used by painter to create art, now imagine the employees of this company go to the street to look how street artist create those amazing art piece on the ground for everyone to see (the artist does ask for donation in a hat next to the art pieces), now let's imagine the employees stay there to look at his techniques for hours and design a new kind of brush that will make it way easier to create the same kind of art.

Would you argue that the company should not be allowed to sell their newly designed brush without giving money to the street artist ?

Should all your teachers be paid for everything you produce throughout your life ?

Should your parents gets compensated every time you use the knowledge you acquired from them ?

In case anyone reading is interested by my opinion: I think intellectual property is the dumbest concept, and one of the biggest scams of capitalism. Nobody should own any ideas. Everybody should be legally able to use anyone else's ideas and build on them. I think we've been deprived of an infinity of great stories, images, lore, design, music, movies, shapes, clothes, games, etc... Because of this dumb rule that you can't use other people's ideas.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

I thought the same, this looks a lot like the place they had the accident in the first movie

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (8 children)

He is saying:

Left is Bernie Sanders

the democrats are the center (leaning right)

the republican are the right.

From the rest of the world point of view: US politics is center right VS extreme right.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I am a french living in France, when did the center made a coalition with the leftists ? What are talking about ?? The center coalition has spent the last 7 years claiming "the left is just as bad as the fascist if not worse".

Did I miss a recent news ?

 

I know it's not a new problem, but I don't know what I can or should do..

I'm made a design that I shared for free on thingiverse under a Creative commons, attributions, non-commercial license.

I've been made aware today that two etsy sellers are using my design, they didn't ask me and they don't attribute me. I don't particularly mind that people print and sell my design (I understand the added value of it already being printed for the user) , but I feel it is unfair to buyers to not be made aware that the design is free and they could easily get it printed cheaper elsewhere (design is small, it's like half a dollar worth of plastic).

It would also have been nice to send me a share of the profit made from my design..

What can I do or should I do ?

view more: next ›