this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

News

22890 readers
3749 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“I’m just ashamed that this bill even came into fruition,” a Lexington council member said.

top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago

I thought that Republican lawmaker was homeless! Woops! At least I didn't break any Laws!

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I was homeless just North of their border so the police here in Ohio set me up with a fake felony to keep me in jail. A dude stopped his truck in front of me while I was Doordashing, cornered me into a fist fight, and then told the police I hit him with my car. The people in the car behind me also backed him up. It never happened, so why was it so simple for me to be locked in jail indefinitely with my and lawyer telling me COVID suspended the fair and speedy trial? I cannot handle being in a noisy environment and have avoidant personality disorder, so I eventually caved to the plea deal. Now here I am nearly 2 years out with an ok job and my own place but I need to come up with $1100 before the end of the month for my fines or go back to court.

I'm convinced they're just trying to create a slave class. If you are an easy target, they'll take you and mark your record so you have to be cheap labor for three upper class.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I’m sorry our society failed you and wish you the best for the future.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago

I gotta say it.

Ok Boomer.

Society has failed everyone. It's just that most people don't see it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How it is people could possibly believe in the legitimacy of legal systems knowing how they only make it easier for evil people to victimize others instead of protecting them is beyond me.

I am so sorry for what you went through.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

It's easy. Nobody gets to see what actually happened. They see what Fox news tells them and nothing of what goes on in the Hamilton county jail. More than likely nobody is even interested. They either have their own problems or are comfortable enough im their life to think I deserved what I got. There's even people who are such rent seekers that they think I deserved it simply by virtue of not paying to live in a house.

Nobody is gonna help me except my roommate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

This proposed law also has a three strikes law in it. Life in prison without parole for 3 felonies.

Also, apparently child defendants aren't allowed to have a jury? That's not highlighted, so it's current law there.

This entire thing is an authoritarian wet dream. Create outlaws, and then turn them into slaves or bodies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Children arent allowed to have juries in other states too. I got told repeatedly during my Juvenile case that children don't have rights. They fucked me good for a miniscule amount of Marijuana. I'm talking, fucking years of my childhood. I don't want to say the state because it might out my identity but I'll give you a hint, its another shithole state that comes to mind when you think of fucking cousins, much like Kentucky. Glad to be out of that part of the country forever now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Had similar late childhood. Put on probation for weed possession, then would get locked up for every minor infraction. A local police officer would follow me around whenever he saw me, make up excuses for pulling me over, and search my car. Got locked up for 6 months for being 30 minutes late to school once... because I got pulled over on the way to school. I'm guessing there was some kind of graft going on with the probation officers, judges, and detention centers, because they would give out such long sentences for such minor offenses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

You see, Republicans want to protect children so clearly they cannot be seen by a dangerous jury.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

It also bans charitable organizations from paying more than $5000 in bail.

For violent felonies, it doesn't allow them to pay bail at all.

Which means anyone could provoke anyone to violence and they would be jailed with no hope of escape. Including ostensibly a homeless person by destroying their stuff.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I feel like the biggest issue is what would amount to homeless corralling, and if they violated the law by living outside the designated zone, they'd be fined. The state knows they wouldn't be able to pay, and thus 90+ days of prison labor.

"The proposed legislation grants cities the authority to designate specific areas for unhoused individuals. If individuals are found outside of the designated area, residing in a tent, hut, temporary shelter, or vehicle with the intention to sleep, they may face misdemeanor charges, leading to a fine of $5,000 and a potential imprisonment of up to 90 days."

Don't get me wrong, the deadly force bits are definitely worse, but I feel like what I quoted above is the true motivation.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Hmmm. This feels eerily similar to an episode of star trek deep space nine.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Hmmm. This feels eerily similar to an episode of star trek deep space nine.

I was just thinking about that episode with the Bell riots when I read that comment as well.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ah, so the Sanctuary Cities that preceed the Bell Riots.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Ah, so the Sanctuary Cities that preceed the Bell Riots

Funny how reality mimics fiction, or more accurately, fiction predicts future reality.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How do you know if someone is “unhoused”. Does this apply to anyone who is outside?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They define it, so anyone who actually reads the law can see what it means legally. Then if the person leasing or who owns the property believes the homeless person is threatening them they can shoot them.

Now I'm not trying to call you out for not reading the specific law. I didn't include it here either for the same reason. The problem is very few people will go read that law. So the day this passes, the clock is ticking to a black teenager getting shot with this law as a cover. It'll be just another way to make people tune out. Dickhead claims the victim was homeless and aggressive. And just like pulling up juvenile history, or a picture with a bong, most of the country will tune out.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago

I always feel threatened and since I believe in impermanence, I see and believe everyone is homeless. Step on my lawn, mofo!!!!!!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Licenses to Kill for everyone! Seriously though, can you really make murder legal, and not face any federal consequences?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago

Typically states are allowed to set their own criminal laws as it's considered within their powers under the 10th Amendment without federal interference. But they can't pass a law that would violate the US constitution. This one I'm sure would lead to at least a couple of constitutional arguments, one being that if the state used execution to punish illegal camping it would definitely violate the 8th Amendment, and they can't just get around that by outsourcing enforcement to individuals. Even this very Republican supreme court might now allow that.

But to answer the question, if the state wanted to just straight up legalize murder for everyone I think they'd be able to do it without issue.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago

They make murder legal but abortion illigal because it is murder

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I bet the creators of this law claim to be Christian & mistakenly think they are going to spend eternity in Heaven.

It always amazes me that so many self-professed Christians have almost as much disrespect for their religion as I do.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I bet the creators of this law claim to be Christian

I bet they also claim to be "pro life"...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Pro-life = pro-forced birth.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago

Bad Samaritans

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

oh look Republicans wanting to kill Americans again

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

No one is safe, unless they haven't been born yet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

"Then he will say to those on his left, `Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. 42 For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, 43 I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.' 44 "They also will answer, `Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?' 45 "He will reply, `I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.' 46 "Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life."

-Some Socialist Groomer Theater Kid

I'd bet any amount of money that most of not all of this bill's co-sponsors profess (at least surrounding election time) to a personal relationship with Jesus Christ, and a striving to be more Christlike. And all of them seemingly impervious to cognitive dissonance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I'm an atheist who believes strongly in separation of church and state, but I would dearly love for this to be appended to the law as an amendment. The place is already a theocratic nuthouse so might as well use that to do some good for a change.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

too bad everything is left up to individual countries mean states to decide laws

maybe strong federal laws and making states comply to it and not allow fifty united states to individually decide on every issue would keep this from happening

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't want Kentucky deciding on my state's laws.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago

They don't have the votes. I think that is the point of a strong federalist system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago

Well The Onion is damn near prophetic sometimes.

Got a chuckle out of the article when I read this part...

At press time, a fierce debate had broken out in the post’s comments after detractors warned the blaze would be too loud.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

There used to be a subreddit called /theonionwasright

I dunno if it's still there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn't work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: [email protected]

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

It was renamed to ‘news’.

Very concise,, and a good laugh to be had.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The bill also gives people the ability to justify use of “defensive force” upon an unhoused person in instances of criminal trespass, including “unlawful camping” on the owner’s property. This would allow property owners to use deadly force against unhoused people on their property without facing criminal consequences.

Sounds like Kyle Rittenhouse is gonna get his mom to drive him to Kentucky. Seriously though, this is fucking disgusting legislation. Homeless people are dehumanized enough but Kentucky is on the verge of legalizing hunting them for sport. What vile pieces of shit those 45 Republican co-sponsors are.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So they can kill squatters? Next step, people who are late on rent?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Sure! Then they can have an estate sale so they can recoup their "losses!"

/s because I'm pretty sure it's needed, sadly