this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2024
718 points (91.6% liked)

linuxmemes

21826 readers
528 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    (page 4) 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

    Security is temporary. Nothing is safe.

    [–] [email protected] 66 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

    Obscurity is not security. Obscurity is the fake sensation of privacy, you are on the hands of the creator.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago

    *flames, screaming, sound of glass breaking*

    God I love the smell of Usenet in the morning

    [–] [email protected] 177 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Security by obscurity is not real.

    [–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

    Not on it's own. But as part of a multi layered approach of does help.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 45 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
    [–] [email protected] 32 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

    How can our eyes be real if mirrors aren't real?

    [–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

    Have you ever looked, like really looked at your hands?

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

    Is macOS more secure than OpenBSD?

    App sandbox, SIP, and the Secure Enclave are awesome, but I don’t know how macOS actually compares to the BSDs these days.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 33 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

    Any judgment of “best” needs to specify “for what use case?”

    I’m a MacOS daily driver, and I think it is the best for most of the use cases that matter to me.

    But not all of them. And my use cases could easily change a little bit and make MacOS a miserable choice to stick with.

    Everything is a trade-off.

    Edit: And as for closed source security, I hope nobody seriously makes that argument anymore, do they?

    [–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    To quote from a paper on the topic of OS security:

    https://iststudentlab.uap.asia/student-exhibits/periodicals-on-advancements-in-operating-systems-and-networking

    According to the paper [5], windows is the most user friendly and has more hardware compatibility. In terms of security, Linux is the most secure among all OS given that it is an open- source operating system which gives users the ability to customize and implement security patches. As for memory management, macOS is the better option due to its fully integrated virtual memory system which is often on and continuously provides addressable space up to 4 per process. The virtual memory system allocates extra space for swap files on the root file system as a program uses space.

    All available OS offer some level of security features such as firewalls, antivirus software, and encryption [6]. macOS has a level of security due to its unique operating system designed specifically for Apple devices with no third-party developers involved. Linux, being open source, is often regarded as more secure than Windows, which is a target of many malware attacks [7].

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

    As for memory management, macOS is the better option due to its fully integrated virtual memory system which is often on and continuously provides addressable space up to 4 per process.

    Wow, 4 whole memories per process?!

    [–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    windows is the most user friendly

    This is entirely dependend on what you're used to I think, because I used to think this too but now I can't do anything with windows anymore.

    load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Linux is the most secure among all OS given that it is an open- source operating system which gives users the ability to customize and implement security patches.

    Imagine trusting folks to keep their stuff up-to-date, though. People get very hostile at the mere suggestion that they need to update when "everything works fine right now, why should I?"

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

    When people say that (usually older folks that are used to something) they usually mean the UI. I wish there was a vendor that would keep their UI constant while patching just security and bugs.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    They still do.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: ‹ prev next ›