this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
283 points (91.3% liked)

News

23770 readers
3681 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Joe Biden regrets having pulled out of this year’s presidential race and believes he would have defeated Donald Trump in last month’s election – despite negative poll indications, White House sources have said.

The US president has reportedly also said he made a mistake in choosing Merrick Garland as attorney general – reflecting that Garland, a former US appeals court judge, was slow to prosecute Donald Trump for his role in the 6 January 2021 insurrection while presiding over a justice department that aggressively prosecuted Biden’s son Hunter.

With just more than three weeks of his single-term presidency remaining, Biden’s reported rueful reflections are revealed in a Washington Post profile that contains the clearest signs yet that he thinks he erred in withdrawing his candidacy in July after a woeful debate performance against his rival for the White House, Trump, the previous month.

(page 5) 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Fuck's sake. As deluded as he was when he stayed in despite internal polling showing him losing in a landslide. Fuckwad very well may have handed American democracy over to its execution.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago

Not even American and I know that's BS lol

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What a prick. No ownership of his candidacy-destroying debate performance. And thanks for taking so long to withdraw after you fucked that to the moon. Let him be the basis for age ceilings on presidential candidates.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

This feckless fuck over here, I am starting to think Ol'Corn Pop beat the dog shit out of him back in the day.

End Citizens United, force retirement at 65, and term limits for all governmental appointments and elected officials.

As my old granddad used to say "If one stinks of shit you best believe they all stink of shit."

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

You can go back and look at Pew polling or Gallup polling. The top concern for people who voted Trump was the economy. Within that, the aspect that they were most concerned about was prices. That is, people were very unhappy about inflation. There was a lot of inflation relative to normal US levels under Biden.

The Trump administration also adopted inflationary policy. And doing so was generally considered desirable by economists; having inflation is preferable to recession in terms of the impact on a country, and COVID-19 was going to produce some level of economic disruption. But that doesn't change the fact that the public doesn't view inflation in that way; it's very unpopular with the public, and past polling has shown that the public, in the US and elsewhere, is more upset about having inflation than a recession.

https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c8881/c8881.pdf

The results show that most people in all countries would choose low inflation even if it meant that millions more people would be unemployed.

In general, the American public also attributes short-term aspects of the economy directly to the President.

The Trump campaign also worked to drive those concerns and associate them with the Biden administration.

Benefitting from mis-attribution of economic behavior and policy is not unique to the Republicans. Clinton benefited from it; the "it's the economy, stupid" slogan played off public concern about economic policy where there probably wasn't much to blame Bush for, but the public was still upset about it. To some extent, it winds up being luck of the draw; if the economy is growing when you're President, people tend to credit you for it, whether you really deserve credit or not, and if it's contracting, people tend to blame you for it, again whether you really deserve blame or not. They don't go digging through data or reading much about where policy originated.

That's been a property of American elections for some time.

If you want to change that, you have a hard communications problem.

My guess is that neither Biden nor Harris was going to solve that communication problem, fundamentally change that aspect of electoral politics, and I think that unless they managed to pull some very large rabbit out of the hat, that was going to dominate the election.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 154 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The US president has reportedly also said he made a mistake in choosing Merrick Garlandas attorney general – reflecting that Garland, a former US appeals court judge, was slow to prosecute Donald Trump for his role in the 6 January 2021 insurrection

At least that part is fair

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 270 points 1 week ago (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

I mean he might have, a lot of people that voted for Biden in 2020 did not vote for Kamala in 2024 for various reasons. Trump did only very slightly better in 2024 than be did in 2020. Would the people who stayed home and didn't vote for Kamala have gotten out and voted for Biden? Maybe. If anything though Biden should have dropped out sooner or not ran at all, the DNC should have fielded better candidates, instead they spent 4 years (longer) trying to strangle any progressives before they could become feasible candidates.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I agree, but it deserves more discussion than just "No."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

I mean he already had, and if he had capitalized on how a LOSER was going to try and LOSE again because he was a huge loser I think he might have swayed many of the minds

[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 week ago

But of course he would think that. 🙄🙄

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›