this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
358 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

60213 readers
2740 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Anno 1800 looks great, better than all the previous titles and is definitely a plus

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

The opposite issue that Gamefreak has...

Personally, I think new games DO NOT need to surpass Monster Hunter: World and GTA 5. These games still look great to me. I can't imagine most people wanting 4K monitors and the PC parts required to run it. A game running on a good 1440p preset looks fantastic anyways.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

Oh these fuckers.

So now the horribly expensive games with micro transactions isn't enough for them? Well of course.

Nothing is ever enough for them.

Fucking are we gonna have to do a violent armed socialist revolution just to checks notes keep having graphics in games we have to pay an arm and a leg for?

[–] [email protected] 45 points 5 days ago (6 children)

All the best games I've played recently are deliberately low poly models, low res textures, and 100% focused on JUST satisfying gamefeel and fun gameplay mechanics.

Fuck graphical fidelity and fuck "AAA" studios for wasting our time and money on it.

I WANT SHORTER GAMES WITH WORSE GRAPHICS MADE BY PEOPLE WHO ARE PAID MORE TO WORK LESS AND I'M NOT KIDDING

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Absolutely on the shorter games. I just do not have time for 30 to 40 hour games anymore. 8 to 10 hours is the sweet spot for me. After that I get bored and the game feels like a drag.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Imo it feels like the content is not very fresh compared to when you played that first rpg/open world/etc. It just does not feel like these aaa studios are innovating anymore- I'm looking for compelling stories and tight gameplay loops but they're feeding us rehashed side quests fillers and eye candy. Anyone feel like they're just playing borderlands sequels where you're constantly forced into a meaningless quest to do somebody's bidding?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

BUT HOW DO WE FORCE PEOPLE TO BUY OUR NEW CONSOLES?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

You would think if anyone had any brains they wouldn't want you to have to buy new consoles all the time. Aside from Nintendo, the hardware is usually a loss leader for the other major players and they make all their money on the licensing costs on the software, i.e. game sales, whereas they lose money every time a console ships out the door. Especially nowadays when the distribution is mostly digital and costs them practically nothing vs. the bad old days when they had to press discs and print labels and shit. Machine sales themselves have never been profitable at least for the first several years each system is out for the last several console generations.

It would be more profitable for Sony and Microsoft to keep you on the same console generation forever -- with the inevitable falling cost of manufacturing the things, to boot -- keeping it at the same MSRP and simply selling you more and more games for it.

Plus it would make their console sales numbers look really badass... eventually. "The Microsoft Xbox X One X S XS Series OneX S is the best selling video game console in history, selling 1.2 billion units over its 45 year life cycle, and counting!"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

I think it’s crazy that we always want prettier games when you still have visual glitches like cars disappearing in your rearview mirror, buildings and textures appearing late, screen tearing when you make your POV spin.

I don’t really need way better graphics, but I’d need these things gone as they take me out of my game way more than no raytracing or a slight fps drop.

I think these things would be easy to solve if we didn’t always get better graphics.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Object permanence in a game still has yet to blow my mind. Dwarf fortress does it pretty well (abandoning a mine to ruin only to revisit the walls you etched aeons ago as an adventurer), and minecraft of course, but any game with decent graphics seem to just abandon this altogether. You're just visiting that world, you're not making any change

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

Also, interactivity. Both games you mentioned have unparalleled interactivity when compared with the triple A space.

Not saying it's necessary, but at a certain level of fidelity/realism it starts to look really weird when the world doesn't meaningfully react to your actions.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

Well I meant more something like you driving a car fast in an open world and having objects appearing in front of you because everything isn’t loaded yet.

Or landscape disappearing from your rear view mirror in racing games in order to save some memory.

These things wouldn’t cost anything to solve if we gave up some graphical fidelity.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago (3 children)

What cutting edge graphics? The blurry as smudge that is TAA in all the modern games? Fuck off. What's expensive is the actual slop that is modern games

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago

I can only really think of two games that really justify enormous development costs, and that's Red Dead Redemption 2 and Baldur's Gate 3.

If your game isn't pushing things to that level of expectation, you really need to rethink what you're doing with that budget.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago

What about destructible environment, physics, attention to details?

All what I see nowadays are mediocre products in flashy packaging. Consumers seem to prioritize aesthetics over quality; if a game is colorful and visually appealing, it often sells well. Whats up with freedom of jumping on that crate, blowing up that wall, shooting up the props etc.

At times, it feels as though I am confined within an enclosure, where the visuals and sounds serve merely to distract me from this realization.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

bruh Im out here still playing Beyond Oasis. Just make a good fucking game and I'll play it for 30 years. I dont think people making games actually listen to people playing games.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago

the broader genre of single-player action games has mostly diminished to Soulslikes and gacha games a la Genshin Impact

I call bullshit. There are all kinds of awesome, successful, action games that don't fit this mold. This whole piece reads like it was placed by a high level exec that's preparing to lay off a bunch of graphic artists and devs.

Art > graphics, but this article sucks.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago

Animal Well was the best game I played this year and it was made by one dude who built his own engine.

Balatro is a close second with the best soundtrack. The Dev bought it on Fiverr.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago

9 times out of 10, I won't see your brand new AAA title for several years after release. While there are occasional exceptions, I don't really buy at launch. Your cutting edge graphics mean nothing to me without story, characters, and writing. If you invest in looks without substance, I will never waste my time with you.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago

add me to the crowd where graphics is not a major thing. its great ad can make one game preferable to another but im all about character customization both in look and abilities.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 days ago

I mean, how are they supposed to pay the execs millions of dollars if they have to pay the developers to make the game do the thing?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Graphics are not everything, for me it's game-play first. I'm playing Carrier Command 2 now for a month straight and it has mediocre pixel and low-poly graphics, but the immersion is fantastic. It's a time sink and I forget when I should quit playing it. Hyper realistic graphics have their audience, but now they're at the point where a little improvement in graphics has diminishing returns, hence the high cost.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I used to play carrier command back in the day. It had low poly graphics, but it was great for the time. I used to love flying a Manta to escort a walrus to hit a long distance target. Did you play the original? How does it compare?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago

Unfortunately I haven't played the original but the sequel is fine for me. I just beat for Christmas 4 AI enemy carriers and it was fun. Sure, the game feels unfinished because it was cut out mid production due to time constrains, but according to me, the game devs are sitting on a golden goose. They simply have to finish the game and make it more popular. I'm pretty sure the game would rock. Up until now it's fine as a RTS in first person perspective, but definitively it needs QOL improvements that the community behind it are desperately asking for. It can get stale and boring after a while. More variety of play is needed and definitely more complex islands to invade and conquer.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

Great, new game to try. Love me some quality time sinks.

Fully agree on graphics- I want to enjoy a game, graphics are only a component of that, and its not necessarily hyper realistic.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›