this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Tech

1482 readers
14 users here now

A community for high quality news and discussion around technological advancements and changes

Things that fit:

Things that don't fit

Community Wiki

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ubisoft is being called out for a clause people have discovered in its licence agreement that orders owners of its games to destroy them should the studio choose to end service for those games. However, not only is the clause not new, as some have implied, but Ubisoft is far from the only studio that has it in its licence agreement.

Not only has that clause been in the Ubisoft EULA for a while, but the same sentiment can be found in EULAs you've agreed to before playing other games from an array of different studios. As highlighted by Amon274 on Reddit, the same clause can be found in the EULAs for various games on Steam, including Final Fantasy 7 Remake, Metaphor: ReFantazio, and Oblivion Remastered. A Phasmophobia dev also pointed to a similar clause in multiple agreements when the game was called out for the exact same thing two years ago.

Even your copies of Baldur's Gate 3 have got to go if Larian Studios ever deems it so.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago

The Stop Killing Games movement is great because it brought this kind of thing to light. I just hope it will succeed and not just fizzle out after gamers think getting 1M signatures is the end of the road. There is a long battle ahead.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Imagine you buy a car. After 10 years the manufacturer doesn't provide any spare parts and service checks.

Now you have to destroy your car.

Does it make sense?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you lease you car you have to give it back.

If you license your games for the duration of them being active, then it makes sense.

The biggest issue, miscommunication, and often illegal practice is calling it buying when it is only a limited subscription. IIRC Steam recently (finally had to) change the wording away from "buying". Because it's not buying if you don't own the product afterwards.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago

You are correct about the miscommunication bit.

But when you lease a car, do you get told when the lease ends?

When you buy a license for a game, do you get told when that license ends?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

At least we can buy Baldur's Gate 3 on GOG.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

License agreements aren't laws.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And even if they were, laws don't have to be followed.